VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new weekly rent of £560.50 for an assured periodic tenancy, starting from April 1st, 2024. This decision was based on current market conditions and the fact that no white goods were provided in the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determinationmarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the conditions of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new weekly rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new weekly rent of £560.50 for an assured periodic tenancy, effective from 1 April 2024, based on market conditions and the absence of white goods.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0181

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 135 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [NAME] Enfield [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 560.50 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable - Per -

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 April 2001

6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly periodic tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Beds were provided at the commencement of the tenancy.

9. Description of premises 4-bedroom terrace house with 2 bathrooms and a living room space. There are also front and rear gardens.

[NAME] of Decision 23 December 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0181

Property : 135 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 25 March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME]

Date of Summary Reasons

: 23 December 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £560.50 per week with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 1 March 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £561.39 per week in place of the existing rent of £437.26 per week to take effect from 1 April 2024.

2. On 25 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 25 March 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. There were no written submissions from the parties.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £590 per calendar week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

No white goods being provided within the property.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per week Market Rent

£590.00

Less No white goods

) 5%

£29.50

£560.50

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £560.50 per week.

Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £560.50 per week.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £560.50 to take effect on 1 April 2024, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 23 December 2024

3

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the market rent.
  • The Tribunal determined the new rent would take effect from April 1, 2024, as proposed in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a new weekly rent of £560.50 for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on market conditions and the lack of white goods in the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the current market value of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect their rent to be adjusted according to current market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the current market value of similar properties and the condition of the property.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed within a month of the decision.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.