Tribunal Sets New Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a new monthly rent of £1500 for an assured periodic tenancy. The decision was based on the local rental values and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and local rental values.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on local rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new monthly rent of £1500 for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988, considering local rental values and the terms of the tenancy.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0277
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [NAME] 8 Mint walk, Croydon, [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1500 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 May 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 18 March 2020
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord none
9. Description of premises Semi-detached house comprising four rooms, kitchen and bathroom/wc, double glazing and central heating
[NAME] of Decision 9 October 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AH/MNR/2024/0277
Property : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] of Application : 3 May 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mrs [NAME] of Hearing : 9 October 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1500 per calendar month with effect from 18 May 2024. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS
Background 1. On 2 April 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1495.91 per month in place of the existing rent of £1209.60 per month to take effect from 18 May 2024.
2. On 3 May 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The tenant did not make any submissions regarding the condition or value of the property.
5. The landlord provided a brief description of the house as being semi- detached, the accommodation comprised a living room and kitchen on the ground floor, three bedrooms and bathroom/wc on the first floor. The house is double glazed and centrally heated, parking is available in the front garden. Carpets, curtains and white goods are the tenant’s. The rent proposed is based on the Local Housing Allowance, it has not been increased since 2019.
Determination and Valuation
6. As neither part has provided any open market rental evidence I have relied on my own expert, general knowledge of rental values in South Croydon. I am of the opinion that the open market rent of the property is £1,500 per month to take into account the terms of the tenancy and that the tenant has provided the floor and window coverings and white goods.
Decision 7. I therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £1,500 per month.
9.I direct the new rent of £1,500 per month to take effect on 18 May 2024 in accordance with the date in the landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 9 October 2024
3 ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL
I. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp- pta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper- tribunal-lands-chamber II. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
III. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
IV. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law.
Appendix Housing Act 1988
14 Determination of rent by rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and
4 (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME]; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable
5 for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements…. (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct.
6
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2100 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal.
- The rent must be based on comparable evidence and the property's condition.
- Landlords can expect a reasonable market rent, typically around £700 per month.
- Tenants are entitled to a fair rent adjustment if the property conditions are unsatisfactory.
- The fair market rent should consider the property's condition and improvements.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new monthly rent of £1500 for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the local rental values and the terms of the tenancy agreement.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the local rental values.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair market rent to be set by the Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents provided by both parties were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
