VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £415 per week, effective from April 1, 2024, following the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering the terms of the existing tenancy and disregarding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £415 per week for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988. The decision took effect from 1 April 2024.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0216

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 6A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Enfield Let Address Civic Centre, Enfield, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 415 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A three-bedroom first floor flat located over commercial premises forming part of a three storey building located in a mixed commercial and residential area.

[NAME] of Decision 29th October 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAK/MNR/2024/0216

Property : 6A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : Enfield Let

Date of Objection : 25th March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 29th October 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £415 per calendar week with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 1st March 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £488.95 per week in place of the existing rent of £368.22 per month to take effect from 1 April 2024 being an increase of £120.73 per week.

2. The Tenants application is dated the 25 March 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties together with the assistance of Google Maps and Rightmove.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the limited written submissions provided by the parties. No comparable evidence was provided by the parties to the Tribunal.

Determination and Valuation

5. Firstly, having consideration of the Landlord’s comparable evidence together its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Enfield area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £415 per week. (£1,800 per month)

6. The Tribunal has received no evidence from the parties in relation to the condition of the property and therefore no adjustments have been made.

Decision 7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £415 per calendar week.

11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £415 per week to take effect on the 1 April 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.

3

Chairman: [NAME]: 29th October 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £415 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the current market conditions and the property's location.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's value to similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than what the landlord had proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions and comparable evidence from both parties were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and grounds for appeal vary.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.