Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £337.66 per week, effective from April 1st, 2024. This decision was based on the open market value of the property and adjustments for certain factors.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £337.66 per week for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the open market value of the property and making necessary adjustments.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0207
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 90a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge [NAME]
Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT], 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 337.66 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024
*3. The amount included for services is 5.16 Per week
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 01/11/2006
6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement - S.11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises
Ground floor 2 bedroom flat with living room, kitchen and bathroom with garden.
Chairman Judge Tagliavini Date of Decision 7 November 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0207
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Ms [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 21 March 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Judge [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 7 November 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £332.50 per week plus £5.16 service charges with effect from 1 April 2024 ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 20 February 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £159.11 per week plus weekly service charges of £5.16 in place of the existing rent of £147.55 plus £5.16 service charges to take effect from 1 April 2024.
2. On 21 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 22 March 2024.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant in the application form.
Determination and Valuation 5. In the absence of any comparable properties being provided by either party, the tribunal relied upon its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area of NW10. It considered that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/its current condition would be in the region of £475 per week. From this level of rent the tribunal made adjustments of 30% in relation to:
(i) White goods (ii) Furniture (iii) Kitchen (iv) Single glazing
6. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent per week
£475.00
Less 30%
Adjusted market rent
£332.50
Plus service charges (including communal electricity and management charges)
£ 5.16
3 New weekly market rent including service charges: £337.66
7. The Tribunal determines a weekly rent of £337.66 (inclusive of service charges of £5.16).
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £337.66 per week.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of 337.66 (inclusive of £5.16 service charges)to take effect on 1 April 2024. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
10. However, the landlord is not required to charge this market rent and cannot charge more but seek only to charge the rent as set out in its Notice of Increase date 20 February 2024.
Chairperson: Judge Tagliavini
Date: 7 November 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,550 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Monthly Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £280 Per Week for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £337.66 per week for the assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property and adjusted for white goods, furniture, kitchen, and single glazing.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the assessment of the open market rent for the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a higher rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions and the tenancy agreement were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and requirements vary.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
