First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1680 per Month
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £1,680 per month for a flat in Balham. The decision was based on an inspection of the property and consideration of comparable rents in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair and reasonable level based on the property's current condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair and reasonable rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and local rental market comparables.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Balham, London.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £1,680 per month, considering the property's condition and local rental market comparables.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AY/MNR/2023/0247
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 38 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord J [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], Chandler's Ford, Eastleigh, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1680.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st May 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable 0.00 Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21/03/2020
6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A ground floor purpose built flat forming part of a two-storey mid terrace building. Accommodation comprises 4 rooms, kitchen, bathroom/wc, share of rear garden
[NAME] of Decision 24TH November 2023
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAY/MNR/2023/0247
Property : 38 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] M [COUNSEL] as Trustees for [COMPANY] : [COUNSEL] [NAME] of Objection : 23 April 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 24 November 2023
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1680 per calendar month with effect from 1 May 2023. ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On the 24 March 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,700 per month in place of the existing rent of £900 per month to take effect from 1 May 2023. The existing rent had been agreed by negotiation between the parties in March 2022, following the tenant’s succession to an assured periodic tenancy on the death of his mother in March 2020.
2. On the 23 April 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal inspected the property on the 24 November 2023 in the presence of the Tenant and Mr [APPELLANT] on behalf of the Landlord.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has had consideration to the inspection and the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Balham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, double glazing, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £2,800 per month. Using our own expertise, we considered that deductions of 40% should applied to take into account the terms of the tenancy, and the actual current condition of the property as seen on inspection. This provides a deduction of £1,120 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £1,680 per month.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,680 per calendar month.
Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a
3 willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,680 per calendar month.
8.The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,680 to take effect on the 1 May 2023. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 24 November 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Disputed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal.
- The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is in disrepair.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and their financial circumstances.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on the property's condition and market comparables.
- The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £1,680 per month for a flat in Balham.
Who was involved?
A tenant and landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on an inspection of the property and consideration of comparable rents in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and local rental market comparables were key factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord, setting a higher rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider local rental market conditions and property condition when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The inspection report of the property and written submissions from both parties were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions can often be appealed to a higher court if certain conditions are met.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
