VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Based on Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £1,250 per month for a tenant after considering the property's condition and comparing it to similar properties in the area. The decision took into account the property's severe damp and mould problems and outdated fixtures.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on the property's condition and market comparables.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and market comparables.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair rent considering the property's condition and comparable evidence.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a fair rent of £1,250 per month for a tenant based on the property's condition and market comparables, taking into account the property's severe damp and mould issues and outdated fittings.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AM/MNR/2023/0467

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 53 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1250 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 December 2023

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 22 August 2005

6. Length of the term or rental period Succession

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A purpose built first floor flat forming part of a mid terrace Victorian building. Accommodation comprises three bedrooms, living room, kitchen, shower room, lavatory.

[NAME] of Decision 15th February 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAM/MNR/2023/0467

Property : 53 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [COUNSEL]

Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] : None

Date of Objection : 9th November 2023

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 15th February 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,250 per calendar month with effect from 22 December 2023. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 3rd November 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,500 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,100 per month to take effect from 22nd December 2023.

2. On the 9th November 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal inspected the property on the 15th February in the presence of the tenant.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has had consideration to the inspection and the written submissions provided by the tenant and the landlord together with the comparable evidence.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the [ADDRESS] area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £2,500 per month. Using our own expertise, we considered that deductions of 50% should applied to take into account the terms of the tenancy, and the condition of the property. The property is suffering from severe damp and mould due to neglect to the fabric of the building. There is partial central heating. The kitchen and sanitary fittings are very dated and there is significant cracking to wall plaster. All in all, this property is in need of significant refurbishment and upgrade of services., This provides a deduction of £1,250 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £1,250 per month.

It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.

6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,250 per calendar month.

3 Decision

7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,250 per calendar month.

8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,250 to take effect on the 22nd December 2023. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.

Chairman: [NAME]: 15th February 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property is in disrepair.
  • Rent should reflect the open market value of the property.
  • Rent adjustments are based on the property's condition and amenities.
  • Rent is set by considering both current market rates and the specific condition of the property.
  • Rent is determined by the First-tier Tribunal based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the premises.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair rent of £1,250 per month for the tenant.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market comparables, considering the property's severe damp and mould issues.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and its comparability to similar properties.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is well-maintained and compare it to similar properties in the area.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence included the property inspection and written submissions from both parties.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the details of how to do so are provided in the full reasons.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.