VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Disputed Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair market rent for a disputed property. After considering the condition of the property and local rental values, the Tribunal set the rent at £1,750 per month, effective from August 23, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a fair market rent for a property in dispute.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent of £1,750 per calendar month for a disputed property, taking into account the condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/MNR/2024/0507

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] JP

Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT] 2 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1750 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 23rd August 2024

*3. The amount included for services is not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 May 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Tenancy

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises An ex-local authority purpose built third floor flat, accommodation comprises three bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, small balcony.

Chairman: [NAME] of Decision: 22nd November 2024

Case Reference

: Lon/00AZ/MNR/2024/0507

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : Ms [APPELLANT] of Objection : 23 July 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] JP

Date of Summary Reasons

: 22 November 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,750 per calendar month with effect from 18 October 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Background

1. On the 10 July 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,250 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £1,670 per calendar month to take effect from 23 August 2024.

2. The Tenant’s application is dated 23 July 2024 and served under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal inspected the property at around 12.40 on the 22 November 2024 in the presence of the tenant and the landlord with her son.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions and photographs provided by the tenant and the landlord. No comparable evidence was provided by the parties.

Determination and Valuation

5. Firstly, having consideration of the parties’ evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Lewisham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £1,850 per calendar month.

6. The Tribunal has made an adjustment of £100 in relation to condition of the property which included some defective double glazed windows, worn kitchen units and uneven flooring based upon the inspection. This reduces the rent to £1,750 per calendar month.

Decision

7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,750 per calendar month.

8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,750 to take effect on the 23 August 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship as no such evidence was provided.

Chairman: [NAME] : 22nd November 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable rental evidence.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for specific conditions of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property is in disrepair.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent that reflects the open market value of their property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a fair market rent of £1,750 per month for the disputed property.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a landlord and a tenant in a rental dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered the condition of the property and local rental values to determine a fair market rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property, including defects and wear, influenced the final rent determination.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental values when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and written submissions from both the landlord and tenant were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and grounds for appeal vary.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.