VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £875.00 per month for a property held under an assured tenancy. The decision took into account the property's condition and its proximity to a busy road.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property as determined by the Tribunal.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancymarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property considering various factors including location and condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £875.00 per month for a property held under an assured tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and location near a busy road.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AS/MNR/2024/0124

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 50 The Chase, Ickenham, Middlesex, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord (Haskell) Battersea F/[RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 875.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 March 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 5 October 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory periodic monthly assured

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Internal Tenant

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a

9. Description of premises

2 bedroom bungalow , one living room, one bathroom and one kitchen, plus garden Large asbestos building in garden

[NAME] of Decision 2 September 2024

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : LON/OOAS/MNR/2024/0124

Property : 50 The Chase, Ickenham, Middlesex, UB10

8ST

Applicant Tenant : [COUNSEL] : In Person

Respondent Landlord : ([COUNSEL]) Battersea F/[RESPONDENT] : In Person

Type of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : Mr [NAME] [NAME] of determination : 2 September 2024

Date of reasons : 2 September 2024

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 2 September 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £875.00 per month to take effect from 3 March 2024. It should be noted that the amount determined represents the market rent determined under section 13, the landlord may choose to charge less.

Background

1. By way of an [NAME] dated 28 February 2024 , received by the Tribunal on 29 February 2024 the Applicant tenant of 50 The Chase , Ickenham, Middlesex, [POSTCODE] (hereinafter referred to as “the property”) referred a Notice of Increase in Rent (“the Notice”) by the Respondent landlord of the property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) to the Tribunal.

2. The Notice dated 29 January 2024 proposed a new rent of £875.00 per month to take effect on 3 March 2024 in lieu of a passing rent of £810.00 per month.

3. The property was let to the [NAME] on a regulated tenancy, and was succeeded by the [NAME] on 5 October 2020. The Tenant holds the property on a statutory assured monthly periodic tenancy.

4. On 16 June 2024, the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. In accord with [NAME] Tribunal policy the parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken. The tenant requested an inspection but not a hearing.

5. The Directions required the Landlord and Tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 15 July 2024 and 22 July 2024 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party. Both parties complied.

6. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination.

Law

7. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing Landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy.

3

8. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenants’ improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenants’ failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

9. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The property is a 1920s bungalow with two bedrooms, a living room, and a kitchen and bathroom. There is a garden.

Submission – Tenants

10. The Tenant submitted a Reply Form dated 21 June 2024. Additionally, two photographs were submitted of the nearby A40, taken at 0915AM. The reply Form gave details of condition and improvements. 11. The [NAME] dated, gave details of improvements carried out by the [NAME], security gates and the [NAME].

Submissions- Landlord

12. The Landlord submitted a completed reply form.

The Inspection

13. The tribunal inspected the property and found the property to be a two bedroomed semidetached bungalow with a garden. The property has one gas fire and electric storage heaters in each room other than the bathroom and kitchen. The property is in its original condition as built in the late 1920s with an original bathroom, a kitchen part installed in the 1960s and part in 1980s. The windows are all original single glazed.

The Determination

14. The improvements carried out by the [NAME] fall to be inherited by the landlord on succession and form part of the landlord's property from that point. The improvements carried out by the [NAME] remain excluded from the landlord's property for the purposes of the determination of the rent.

15. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and, in particular, to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality. The Tribunal has no regard to the [NAME] rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the passing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal is unable to account for the personal circumstances of either the Landlord or the Tenant.

16. The date the Tribunal assesses the rent is the effective date in the Landlord’s Notice, which is the 3 March 2024. The Tribunal disregards any improvements made by the Tenants but considers the impact on rental value of disrepair, due to the Tenant's failure to comply with the tenancy terms or the Landlord's failure to repair.

4

17. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market, if it were let on the effective date and in the condition that is considered usual for such a market letting.

18. The Tribunal is a specialist Tribunal using its knowledge to ascertain what the property would let for if in a contemporary condition. The Tribunal determined £1550.00 per month in contemporary condition. The Tribunal is mindful of the proximity to the A40 road.

19. There were submissions on the condition or quality of the flat and these were supplemented by the Tribunals inspection. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds adjustments are evidenced and applies a 40% deduction. The rent is £930.00 per month. There is a substantial asbestos building in the garden, the Tribunal makes a further deduction of £55.00 per month to reflect this giving £875.00 per month.

20. The Tenants made no substantive submissions to the Tribunal about delaying the effective date of the revised rent due to undue hardship under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the rent of £875.00 per month will take effect from 3 March 2024.

Valuer Chair Mr [NAME]: 2 September 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].

5

If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting current market conditions and the historical context of the property.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy as determined by the Tribunal.
  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent for their property under an assured tenancy.
  • The Tribunal must determine the rent at which a property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant is entitled to a market rent for their property based on comparable properties in the locality.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set a market rent of £875.00 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and its location near a busy road.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and location of the property were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect a similar process for determining a fair market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and its surroundings were submitted.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.