VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Based on Comparable Properties

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £3,300 per month for a property based on comparable properties in the locality, ignoring personal circumstances of the tenant and landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a market rent for their property based on comparable properties in the locality.

Topics

market rentcomparable propertiesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. The determination considers the terms of the existing tenancy and ignores certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a market rent for a property based on comparable properties in the area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £3,300 per month for a property based on comparable properties in the locality, ignoring personal circumstances of the tenant and landlord.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00BE/MNR/2024/0153

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] , [POSTCODE]

R [NAME]

Landlord [COMPANY] [COMPANY], 5th [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ £3300 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 27 April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 November 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period 6 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a

9. Description of premises 3-bedroom flat, 1 Living room, 1 bathroom. 5th floor

Chairman R [NAME] of Decision 31 July 2024

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : LON/OOBE/MNR/2024/0153

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] : Mr [COUNSEL] [NAME] : In Person

Respondent Landlord : [COMPANY] : In Person

Type of application : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : Mr R [NAME] of determination : 31 July 2024

Date of reasons : 31 July 2024

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 31 July 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £3,300 per month to take effect from 27 April 2024. It should be noted that the amount determined represents the market rent determined under section 13, the landlord may choose to charge less.

Background

1. By way of an application received by the Tribunal on 13 March 2024 the [NAME] of [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (hereinafter referred to as “the property”) referred a Notice of Increase in Rent (“the Notice”) by the Respondent landlord of the property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) to the Tribunal.

2. The Notice, dated 9 February 2024, proposed a new rent of £2216.80 per month in lieu of a passing rent of £1377.24 per month.

3. The property was let to the Tenants by Assured Short hold Tenancy for a 6 month period from 27 November 2020. A copy of the tenancy agreement was provided.

4. On 4 June 2024, the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. In accord with current Tribunal policy the parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken. No objections were received.

5. The Directions required the Landlord and Tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 25 June 2024 and 9 July 2024 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party. Both parties complied.

6. Having reviewed the submissions, the Tribunal concluded that the matter remained capable of being determined fairly, justly and efficiently on the papers, consistent with the overriding objective of the Tribunal.

7. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination.

Law

8. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing Landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy.

3

9. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenants’ improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenants’ failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

10. The Tribunal did not inspect the property. From the Application form, it comprises a 5th floor flat of 3 bedrooms, one living room and a bathroom.

Submission – Tenants

11. The Tenants’ submissions, excluding consideration of personal circumstances which are to be disregarded in setting a market rent under the Act, can be summarised as follows. 12. The Tenant notes on their application Form that the Landlord is responsible for repairs,

Submissions- Landlord

13. The Landlord submitted a Reply Form, noting the accommodation, and that the property is double glazed and has central heating. Curtains, carpets and white goods are provided by the tenant.

14. That the property was built in 2007. 15. Also, a copy of the tenancy agreement was supplied and several comparable properties. 16. The comparables were; [NAME] 3 bedroom at £3300 pcm New amelia apartments 3 bedroom at £3,500 pcm Bermondsey ex local authority at £3,250 pcm

Determination

17. The Tribunal has carefully considered all the submissions before it.

18. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and, in particular, to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality. The Tribunal has no regard to the current rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the passing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal is unable to account for the personal circumstances of either the Landlord or the Tenant.

19. The date at which the Tribunal assesses the rent is the effective date contained within the landlord’s Notice which, in this instance, is the 27 April 2024. The Tribunal disregards any improvements made by the tenants but has regard to the impact on rental value of disrepair which is not due to a failure of the tenant to comply with the terms of the tenancy.

20. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market, if it

4

were let on the effective date and in the condition that is considered usual for such a market letting.

21. The Landlord relies upon a basket of comparable properties advertised as available to let.

22. The Tribunal weighed the parties’ comparable evidence against its own expert knowledge as a specialist Tribunal and having regard to the nature, specification and size of the subject property determined £3300.00 per month.

23. The Tenants made no submissions to the Tribunal about delaying the effective date of the revised rent due to undue hardship under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the rent of £3300.00 per month will take effect from 27 April 2024.

[NAME] [NAME]: 31 July 2024

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

5

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property is in poor condition.
  • The rent is assessed under an assured periodic tenancy.
  • The tribunal must determine a market rent based on comparable properties in the locality.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent is based solely on market conditions without considering the property's condition.
  • The rent is assessed under the Housing Act 1988 without additional context.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a market rent of £3,300 per month for a property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable properties in the locality, ignoring personal circumstances.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might expect a higher rent if comparable properties have higher rents.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of comparable properties and the tenancy agreement mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.