First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent for a property based on similar properties in the area. They set the rent at £1,700 per month, effective from December 1st, 2023.
⚖️ Legal holding
A Tribunal must determine a market rent for a property based on comparable properties in the locality.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a new open-market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the local area. The tribunal must disregard certain factors such as the current rent paid by the tenant, the value of improvements made by the tenant, and any penalties due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new market rent for a property based on comparable properties in the area.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,700 per calendar month for a property based on comparable properties in the locality, disregarding the current rent and personal circumstances of the landlord or tenant.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference : CAM/00MX/MNR/2023/0164 Property : 54 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent
: [redacted] : Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Determination of market rent payable. Tribunal member(s)
:
Judge [NAME], MRICS
Date of decision : 15 January 2024
DECISION
Decision: 1. The Tribunal determined a rent of £1,700.00 per calendar month to take effect from 1 December 2023.
Reasons Background 2. The Landlord by a notice in the prescribed form dated 20 October 2023 proposed a new rent of £1,700.00 per calendar month (pcm) to be effective from 1 December 2023. This was in lieu of the previous rent of £1,100.00 pcm. The Tenant referred the Notice to the Tribunal.
2 3. Parties were requested to complete a pro forma supplying detail of the accommodation on a room-by-room basis, the features of the property (central heating, white goods, double glazing, carpets and curtains) and other property attributes and any further comments that they may wish the Tribunal to take into consideration. This could include any repairs and improvements that had been made, and any comments on the condition of the property.
4. Parties were also invited to include photographs and provide details of any rents for similar properties that they wished to rely on.
5. The determination would take place based on the written information received from both parties. The Tribunal confirmed in Directions dated 30 November 2023 that it did not intend to hold an oral hearing unless either party requested this.
6. As the parties did not request a hearing, this determination has been made on the basis of the written information received namely the [NAME] form, Landlord’s notice proposing new rent, the tenancy agreement dated 1 July 2022, and the reply form from the Landlord, which included details of rentals for similar properties (comparables). The Property 7. The property is a three bedroomed semi-detached house of brick construction with a tiled roof.
8. The accommodation comprises a living room, kitchen, three bedrooms and a bathroom.
9. The property has double glazing and central heating, both provided by the Landlord.
10. There is a garden at the property as well as a garage.
11. The white goods (cooker, washing machine and fridge) have been provided by the Landlord as have the carpets and curtains.
12. The Tribunal has not been made aware of any issues with the condition of the property. The Tenant confirmed in the [NAME] form that improvements that were not the responsibility of the tenants have been completed by the tenants. This work was maintenance to the garden to remove nettles and weeds, sanding and repainting of balustrades, refurbishment of back bedroom (including skimming walls, electrics, radiator, refurbishment and painting), removal and reapplication of silicon and removal of mould in the bathroom and replacement of taps and showerhead. Finally, the Tenant stated that the landlord covered the cost of some of the units and worktops for the kitchen refurbishment but all other costs were covered by the Tenant.
3 The Tenancy 13. The tenancy agreement commenced on 1 August 2022 and a copy of the tenancy agreement was provided. The tenancy term was for an initial period of 12 months at £1,100.00 pcm and a statutory tenancy on the terms of the written agreement appears to have arisen from 1 August 2023. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 applies in respect of Landlord’s repairing obligations. The Law
14. By virtue of section 14 (1) Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal is to determine a rent at which the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured periodic tenancy- (a) having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of rent) are the same as those of the subject tenancy
15. By virtue of section 14 (2) Housing Act 1988 in [NAME] a determination the Tribunal shall disregard – (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement (as defined by section 14(3) Housing Act 1988) carried out by a tenant otherwise than as an obligation; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house due to the failure of the tenant to comply with any terms of the subject tenancy.
Representations – Tenant
16. The Tenant completed the [NAME] form, but no other representations were received.
Representations – Landlord
17. The Landlord completed a reply form dated 11 December 2023, and included an email from Thara Properties Lettings Department dated 8 December 2023 and a Property Report (undated) from Chancellors Property. Two comparables were also attached which showed rents for a three bedroom semi-detached house of between £1,800 and £2,000 pcm.
Determination
4
18. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality in particular. It does not take into account the present rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the existing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal cannot take into account the personal circumstances of either the landlord or the tenant in arriving at the rental level.
19. The Tribunal assesses a rent for the property as it is on the day of the hearing disregarding any improvements made by the tenant but taking into account the impact on rental value of disrepair (if any) which is not due to a failure of the tenant to comply with the terms of the tenancy.
20. The Tribunal has had regard to the comparables provided by the landlord, although is aware that these are asking rents. The Tribunal has also had regard to its own knowledge and expertise.
21. Taking all the matters outlined into account, the Tribunal assesses the open market rent of the property in the condition that it would be expected to be let on the market at £1,700 per calendar month, with no further deductions being applicable. This rent is to take effect from 1 December 2023.
Tribunal Judge Bernadette MacQueen
15 January 2024
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME].
5 If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Denies Landlord's Request for Increased Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Flat in Newbury
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,400 pcm
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal rules against landlord's administration charge
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rent by considering rental values of comparable properties in the locality.
- The property's features, such as double glazing, central heating, a garden, and a garage, were considered.
- The landlord provided white goods, carpets, and curtains, which influenced the rental value.
- The Tribunal considered the asking rents from the landlord's comparable properties, while noting they were asking rents.
- The Tribunal used its own knowledge and expertise to assess the open market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,700 per month for a property.
Who was involved?
The landlord and the tenant were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable properties in the locality, ignoring the current rent and personal circumstances of the landlord or tenant.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, setting a higher rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider comparable properties in their area when disputing rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, details of similar properties, and the tenancy agreement were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
