Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent at £1650.00
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a a person, setting it at £1650.00 per month. This decision was reached after considering the condition of the a person and comparing it with similar properties in the area.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the relevant tenancy legislation, the tribunal has the authority to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market. This determination considers the condition of the property and comparable rents.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on the condition of the property and local market conditions, setting the rent at £1650.00 per month.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the open market rent for a property to be £1650.00 per month, effective from 1st October 2024, after considering various factors including the condition of the property and comparable rents.
📚 Full judgment Official document
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0675 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 22 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tribunal Judge Falder Tribunal Member Gallagher Landlord [RESPONDENT] 834 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] and Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is:£ 1650.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st October 2024 *3. The amount included for services is/is negligible/not applicable N/A Per *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1st April 2022 6. Length of the term or rental period Periodic 7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement dated 24/3/21 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord As per tenancy agreement (Cooker, washing machine, cupboards, table, beds, fitted wardrobes all supplied by landlord)
9. Description of premises Mid 20th century 3 bedroomed semi-detached house, extended at the rear and with an attached single car garage. The house is of brick and tile construction with rendering to the front elevation at first floor level. There is a porch and single storey bay at the front and the rear extension (single storey) is also brick and tile. There is a block paved driveway and lawned area to the front and a good sized rear garden. Internally there are 2 living rooms and a galley kitchen on the ground floor and 3 bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor.
MR22 Chairman Tribunal Judge Falder Date of Decision 29th April 2025
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : MAN/00BN/MNR/2024/0675 [NAME] : 22 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] and Mrs [APPELLANT] [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : s13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge K Falder Tribunal Member J Gallagher MRICS Date of Decision : 29th April 2025 _______________________________________________
DECISION _______________________________________________ Decision 1. By a decision dated 29th April 2025, the Tribunal determined, in accordance with section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, that the open market rent for the [NAME] is £1650.00 per month effective from 1st October 2024. Background 2. By a notice dated 2nd August 2024, (“the Notice”), the Landlord proposed a new rent of £1700.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1400.00 per month to take effect from 1st October 2024.
3. By an application dated 27th August 2024, the Tenant referred the Notice to the Tribunal, (“the Application”).
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 Inspection 5. The Tribunal inspected the [NAME] on 29th April 2025. The Tenant was present at the inspection. The Landlord also attended the inspection.
6. The [NAME] is a mid 20th century 3 bedroomed semi-detached house, extended at the rear and with an attached single car garage. The house is of brick and tile construction with rendering to the front elevation at first floor level. There is a porch and single storey bay at the front and the rear extension (single storey) is also brick and tile. There is a block paved driveway and lawned area to the front and a good sized rear garden.
7. Internally there are 2 living rooms and a galley kitchen on the ground floor and 3 bedrooms and a bathroom on the first floor.
8. The [NAME] is let mostly furnished although the tenant has provided some units and one of the beds. In the kitchen the landlord supplied the cooker and washing machine; other white goods are the tenants.
9. Overall the [NAME] is in reasonable order. The downstairs front aspect windows are old and have caused some issues with rainwater penetration and the rear aluminium framed patio doors are somewhat dated. Heating is via a gas combi boiler situated in the kitchen and all rooms have radiators. One living room also has a wall mounted gas fire which is several years old. The tenant reported problems with the control on this item, but there are no known gas safety issues.
10. Decoration throughout the [NAME] is fair and some repainting would be required prior to re-letting; particularly in the bedrooms. The Law 11. The Tribunal must first determine that the Landlord’s notice under section
13(2) satisfied the requirements of that section and was validly served.
12. The Housing Act 1988, section 14 requires the Tribunal to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject [NAME] might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy.
13. In so doing the Tribunal is required by section 14(1), to ignore the effect on the rental value of the [NAME] of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. Evidence 14. The Landlord provided a Best Price Guide to the Tribunal.
15. The Tenant made written representations to the Tribunal setting out that he wanted the rent to be “£1300.00 or less if possible.” The representations set out that some repairs that needed to be done took 8 months to be fixed and that in several instances he had to find someone to undertake urgent repairs himself (albeit he was compensated for those costs).
16. At the video hearing (after the inspection), the Tribunal also heard oral submissions from both the Landlord and Tenant. The Landlord submitted that the rent increase proposed was simply an increase to a fair market rent. They submitted that the most similar comparable they relied upon was a [NAME] on [ADDRESS] which rented for £1800.00 per month. They submitted that there was a massive shortage of private rented properties in this particular locality.
17. The Tenant submitted that there is a campaign to remove him from the [NAME]. He submitted that he is paying more than the average rent on the street which he claimed to be £1300.00-£1400.00. He stated that two neighbours are acting in an anti-social way towards him. Tribunal’s Deliberations 18. The Tribunal first determined that the Notice was valid in accordance with section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
19. It then had to determine the rent at which it considers that the [NAME] might
reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy on the same terms as that under which the [NAME] is let.
20. The Tribunal noted that the landlord provided some evidence of comparable properties. The Tenant referred anecdotally to a lower rent being paid by neighbours in the same street of £1300.00 and £1400.00 however this was of limited use to the Tribunal as they were unable to discern the dates of any lettings, the terms (furnished or unfurnished) and whether the properties were similarly extended and/or had the same facilities.
21. The Tribunal therefore largely relied on its own knowledge and experience to determine as follows: £ per month Open market rent for a comparable [NAME] to the [NAME] in good condition: 1750.00 Less: Necessary improvements/Landlord’s neglect- minor damp below front bay, poorly sited radiator looks under specified No extractor in bathroom: 100.00 Adjusted Market Rent £1650.00 22. The Tribunal therefore determined the Market Rent for the [NAME] to be £1650.00 per month with effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s notice- namely 1st October 2024. Full reasons provided by Tribunal Judge Falder dated 14th May 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,250 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Manchester Flat at £650 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent at £750
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £740 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Hackney Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Tenancy After Considering Property Condition an…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal.
- The rent determination takes into account the property's condition and market comparables.
- The rent is set at a reasonable level based on the open market value.
- The Tribunal considers the property's condition and local market conditions.
- Rent adjustments reflect the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the open market rent for the property at £1650.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the condition of the property and comparable rents in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the tenant, who wanted a lower rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should expect the rent to be set at a fair market rate based on the condition of the property and comparable rents.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the condition of the property and comparable rent data were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
Yes, it is recommended to seek legal advice from a solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
