VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new market rent of £1250 per month for a property after considering evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent as determined by the Tribunal based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

Topics

market rent determinationtenancy disputes

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions regarding when the new rent can be implemented, including specific dates for yearly and shorter-term tenancies.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for a property based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new market rent of £1250 per month for a property based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area, effective from 20 June 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

Case Reference

: BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0705

Property : 62 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] & [NAME]

Landlord : Dr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Oh [RESPONDENT] of application : 20 May 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : [NAME] & [NAME] of Decision : 31 October 2025

Date of Issue : 09 January 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1250 per month with effect from 20 June 2025. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background

1. On 16 May 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1350 per month in place of the existing rent of £900 per month to take effect from 20 June 2025.

2. On 20 May 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered the submissions and evidence provided by the parties and had regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal considered the written submissions and Reply Forms provided by the Landlord and Tenant.

5. The Tribunal understands from the submissions provided that the property comprises a 3-bed semi-detached house with living room, dining room, kitchen and bathroom with rear garden and a garage and driveway. The property has central heating, double glazing, carpets and curtains and a cooker all of which belong to the landlord.

6. The Tenant advised that there were two new roofs, electric fireplace, new garden fence and oven and hob.

7. The Landlord also advised they had carried out various improvements extending to two new flat roofs and a new main roof, new combi boiler, new fencing and gate, new hob and oven, modernised bathroom with new electric shower, mirrored wall cabinet, extractor fan and PIV air ventilation system. New electric fire and surround in the living room.

8. No evidence of any lettings were submitted by the Tenant or Landlord for the Tribunals consideration.

Determination and Valuation

3 9. Having considered the submissions and Reply Forms provided by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £1250 per month. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to make any deductions from this level of rent to account for condition, tenant’s fixtures and fitting or any other matter.

10. The full valuation is shown below:

Per Month Market Rent

£1250

Say £1250.00

per month Decision

12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property

might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord

under an assured tenancy was £125o per month with effect from 20 June 2025.

Chairman: [NAME]: 31 October 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

4

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 62 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] & [NAME]

Landlord Dr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £1250 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 June 2025

3. The amount included for services is - Per -

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 August 2019 5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly - periodic 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises Three bed semi-detached house.

[NAME] of Decision 31 October 2025

First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.

BIR//00CN/MNR/2025/0705

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent must be based on current market conditions.
  • The condition of the property must be considered.
  • Any improvements made by the tenant should be taken into account.
  • The rent proposal must be reasonable and supported by comparables.
  • Tenant responsibilities under the Housing Act 1988 must be reflected.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1250 per month for the property.

Who was involved?

The tenant and landlord were involved in the dispute over the market rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The evidence and expert knowledge of rental values in the area were crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence and consult expert knowledge of rental values.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions and Reply Forms provided by both parties mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.