VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property under an assured tenancy. After considering comparable properties in the area, the rent was set at £2050 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured tenancy.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancymarket rent

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market. Personal circumstances of the parties are disregarded in this determination.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £2050 per month for a property under an assured tenancy, taking into account comparable properties in the locality and disregarding personal circumstances of the parties.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AC/MNR/2024/0045

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] C Piarroux JP

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 11 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Helen McElveny & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £2050.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 8 February 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable N/A Per N/A

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 8 April 2017

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord De minimis

9. Description of premises 3-bedroom mid terrace with garden and allocated parking

[NAME] of Decision 9 August 2024

1

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case reference : GB/LON/OOAC/MNR/2024/0045

Property : 9 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenants : [COUNSEL] and [COUNSEL] : In Person

Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] [NAME] : In Person

Type of application : Determination of a Market Rent

Sections 13 & 14 Housing Act 1988

Tribunal member(s) : [NAME] Mrs [NAME] Mr [NAME] JP

Date of determination : 9 August 2024

Date of reasons : 9 August 2024

REASONS

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

2

Decision of the Tribunal

On 9 August 2024 the Tribunal determined a Market Rent of £2050.00 per month to take effect from 8 February 2024. It should be noted that the amount determined represents the market rent determined under section 13, the landlord may choose to charge less.

Background

1. By way of an application received by the Tribunal on 16 January 2024 the Applicant tenants of 9 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (hereinafter referred to as “the property”) referred a Notice of Increase in Rent (“the Notice”) by the Respondent landlord of the property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (“the Act”) to the Tribunal.

2. The Notice, dated 8 January 2024, proposed a new rent of £2450.00 per month to take effect on 8 February 2024 in lieu of a passing rent of £1950.00 per month.

3. The property was let to the Tenant by way of an assured shorthold tenancy from 8 April 2017 for 12 months with the contractual period ceasing on the 7 April 2018. Thereafter the tenancy carried on as a statutory monthly periodic tenancy.

4. On 21 May 2024, the Tribunal issued Directions advising the parties that it considered the matter suitable for determination on the papers unless either party objected, in writing, within 7 days. In accord with current Tribunal policy the parties were advised that no inspection would be undertaken. No objections were received to determination on papers were received. However the Tenant requested an inspection was carried out.

5. The Directions required the Landlord and Tenant to submit their completed statements to the Tribunal by 11 June 2024 and 25 June 2024 respectively, with copies to be sent to the other party. Both parties complied.

6. Having reviewed the submissions, the Tribunal concluded that the matter remained capable of being determined fairly, justly and efficiently on the papers, consistent with the overriding objective of the Tribunal.

7. These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each point referred to in submissions but concentrate on those issues which, in the Tribunal’s view, are fundamental to the determination.

Law

8. In accordance with the terms of Section 14 of the Act, the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market, by a willing Landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy.

3

9. In so doing, and in accordance with the Act, the Tribunal ignores any increase in value attributable to tenants’ improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenants’ failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

The Property

10. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The Tribunal found the property to be a terraced house comprising one living/dining room, three bedrooms, one bathroom, and a downstairs WC. The front garden was largely paved with uneven paving. The ground floor kitchen was functional and in repair but dated. The ground floor living room had been extended. There was a ground floor WC which was functional but also dated. In the extended area at the top of the extension wall was a damp area that ran the extension's depth on one side. The first floor contained a bathroom again functional and dated.

11. The garden had plastic grass again uneven in layout. The property was centrally heated and double glazed.

Submission – Tenants

12. The Tenants’ submissions, excluding consideration of personal circumstances which are to be disregarded in setting a market rent under the Act, can be summarised as follows.

13. The Tenant returned a completed Reply Form noting the size of the accommodation and its condition. That the property has central heating but no double glazing. The central heating being supplied by the Landlord as with the white goods.

14. In terms of disrepair the key aspects noted were; rotten wooden window frames, damp black mould, water ingress through brickwork, and no fence between neighbours and Tenant's garden.

15. Additional concern expressed over the size of the rent increase in terms of fairness.

Submissions- Landlord

16. The Landlord made a number of submissions. A schedule of property details showing asking rents these ranged from £2200 to £2695 per month. The schedule is dated 4 June 2024.

17. A letter dated 4 July 2024 which identified the landlords view that the roof was leaking because of unauthorized actions of the Tenant. Additionally, several breaches of covenant have been identified, namely painting and plastering. The landlord asserts the property does not have mould nor subsidence, noting that the tenant should keep the property in good condition including well ventilated.

Determination

18. The Tribunal has carefully considered all the submissions before it.

4

19. The Tribunal determines a market rent for a property by reference to rental values generally and, in particular, to the rental values for comparable properties in the locality. The Tribunal has no regard to the current rent and the period of time which that rent has been charged, nor does it take into account the percentage increase which the proposed rent represents to the passing rent. In addition, the legislation makes it clear that the Tribunal is unable to account for the personal circumstances of either the Landlord or the Tenant.

20. The date at which the Tribunal assesses the rent is the effective date contained within the Landlord’s Notice which, in this instance, is the 8 February 2024. The Tribunal disregards any improvements made by the Tenants but considers the impact on rental value of disrepair, due to the Tenant's failure to comply with the tenancy terms or the Landlord's failure to repair.

21. In the first instance, the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market, if it were let on the effective date and in the condition that is considered usual for such a market letting.

22. The Landlord relies upon a basket of comparable properties advertised as available to let.

23. The Tribunal weighed the parties’ comparable evidence against its own expert knowledge as a specialist Tribunal and having regard to the nature, specification and size of the subject property determined £2400.00 per month.

24. The Tribunal is grateful for the submissions on condition by the parties and the benefit of an inspection.

25. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds adjustments are warranted and the rent determined is £2050.00 per month.

26. The Tenants made no substantive submissions to the Tribunal about delaying the effective date of the revised rent due to undue hardship under section 14(7) of the Act. Accordingly, the rent of £2050.00 per month will take effect from 8 February 2024.

[NAME]: 9 August 2024

5

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant entitled to fair market rent under an assured tenancy.
  • Rent determination based on the property's condition.
  • Rent set according to comparable properties in the locality.
  • Tribunal must determine rent based on reasonable expectations of the open market.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for the property at £2050 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the rental values of comparable properties in the locality, ignoring personal circumstances of the parties.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rental value with similar properties in the area.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a fair market rent determination if they believe the rent is unfair.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of comparable rental prices in the area was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.