First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the rent to £1,900 per month because the property had significant mould and rot infestation. The landlord had proposed a higher rent, but the Tribunal took the property's condition into account.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction based on the property's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord. This determination considers the property's condition and other terms of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a rent of £1,900 per month for a property in poor condition, reducing the landlord's proposed rent of £2,085 per month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00BJ/MNR/2024/0157
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 38 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [COMPANY] 45 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1900 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 19th March 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 19 December 2024
6. Length of the term or rental period Assured Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A mid terrace Victorian house comprising two bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc
[NAME] of Decision 13th August 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOBJ/MNR/2024/0157
Property : 38 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant : Ms [APPELLANT] & Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 14 March 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 13 August 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,900 per calendar month with effect from 19 March 2024. ___________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 26 January 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,085 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,906 per month to take effect from 19 March 2024. The Tribunal were provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement which commenced on the 19 September 2009.
2. On the 14 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The parties considered this matter could be undertaken without an inspection or hearing.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal received written submissions from the tenant together with photographs and a single comparable. No evidence was provided by the landlord in accordance with the Directions dated 17 June 2024.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Clapham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £2,100 per month. This was the market rent initially determined by the landlord.
6. Using our own expertise, the Tribunal considered that a deduction of £200 should applied to take into account the actual current condition of the property based on the photographic evidence which shows significant mould to the walls and rot infestation to the sash windows. This reduces the figure to £1,900 per month.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
3 Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,900 per calendar month.
8.The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,900 to take effect on the 19 March 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 13 August 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Disputed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent After Considering Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Property with Faulty Appliances
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in a state of disrepair.
- The rent requested is above the fair market rate.
- The rent should be adjusted according to the property's condition.
- The tenant can request a rent adjustment based on market comparables.
- The tribunal determines the fair market rent for the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the rent to £1,900 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, which included significant mould and rot infestation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, which was significantly worse than what the landlord proposed.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also have their rent adjusted based on the condition of the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographic evidence showing the condition of the property was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process and grounds for appeal vary.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
