VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a market rent of £1,850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the condition of the property.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determinations

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting for the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AS/MNR/2024/0233

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 50 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] c/o [ADDRESS], Hayes, Middlesex, UB3EP

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1850 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 14 September 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A 1930’s built semi detached house located in an established road, accommodation comprises: three bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc, garden, garage/store room

[NAME] of Decision 15 October 2024

1

Case Reference

: LON/OOAS/MNR/2024/0233

Property : [ADDRESS], hayes, UB3 1ITB

Tenant

: Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME] of Objection : 20 March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 15 October 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,850 per calendar month with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On the 15 February 2024 the Landlord’s agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,850 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,650 per month to take effect from 1 April 2024.

2. The Tenants application is dated the 20 March 2023, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, however this is considered a typing error. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the extensive written submissions provided by the landlord and tenant together with a comparable evidence, statement of case and photographs.

Determination and Valuation

5. Firstly, having consideration of the Landlord’s comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Hayes area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £2,200 per month.

6. From this level of rent we have made an adjustment of approximately 16% (£350) in relation to condition of the property based upon the photographic evidence and the parties’ statements.

Decision 7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy governed by the relevant clause in the agreement was £1,850 per calendar month.

11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of 1,850 to take effect on the 1 April 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the tenant undue hardship.

3

Chairman: [NAME]: 15 October 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a market rent of £1,850 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the condition of the property and comparable evidence.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property was a key factor in determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a determination of a fair market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and comparable evidence were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get a solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.