VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £352.75 per week after considering the condition of the property and comparable evidence.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancymarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent of £352.75 per week for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/00AP/MNR/2024/0225

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 62 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 29-35 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 352.75 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2024

3. The amount included for services is

£3.96 Per Week

4. Date assured tenancy commenced February 2016

5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None notified.

8. Description of premises Late 20th century 2 bed, mid-terrace house with garden

[NAME] of Decision 19 August 2024

1

Case Reference

: TR/LON/00AP/MNR/2024/0225

Property : 62 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Ms [APPELLANT]

Landlord : London & Quadrant

Date of Application : 27 March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME]

Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons

: 30 September 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £352.75 per week with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background 1. On 29 January 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £154.75 per week (including £3.96 per week for fixed service charges) in place of the existing rent of £143.46 per week (including £3.45 per week for fixed service charges) to take effect from 1 April 2024.

2. On 27 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 28 March 2024.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £415 per calendar week. From this level of rent we have made an adjustment of 15% in relation to the double glazing and some of the doors at the property being in need of replacement.

6. The valuation is shown below:

Hypothetical Market Rent Per Week £415 LESS 15% Double glazing and some doors in need of replacement £62.25

Market Rent Per Week £352.75

7. This rent includes £3.96 per week in fixed service charges, which is included and separately identified.

8. The Tribunal determines a rent of £352.75 per week and this equates to approximately £1,528.58 per calendar month.

3 Decision 9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £352.75 per week, including £3.96 per week in fixed service charges.

10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £352.75 per week to take effect on 1 April 2024, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

11. The rent the Tribunal has determined is the maximum rent that may be charged at the property, but the Landlord may charge a lower amount should they wish.

Chairman: [NAME]: 30 September 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent.
  • The tenancy is classified as assured periodic.
  • The request pertains to a fair market rent adjustment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a fair market rent of £352.75 per week for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property, setting the rent at £352.75 per week.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect a fair market rent to be determined based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable evidence and the condition of the property were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.