VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £1,050 for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposal for a higher rent. This decision was made according to the Housing Act 1988, taking into account the property's location and market conditions.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. If a landlord proposes a new rent, the tenant can also apply to the tribunal to challenge this proposed rent increase. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering factors such as the property's location, condition, and market comparables.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set a new market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,050 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, rejecting the landlord's proposed rent increase of £1,150 per month. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the property's location, condition, and market comparables.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0134

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 17 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr & Mrs [RESPONDENT] & [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] [NAME], 45A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1050.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 07 May 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 07 March 2007

5. Length of the term or rental period 12 Months

6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises A one bedroom semi-detached house with garden and garage.

[NAME] of Decision 10 July 2023

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/43UB/MNR/2023/0134 Property : [ADDRESS], Walton on Thames, Surrey [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Ms [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] & [COUNSEL] : [COUNSEL] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

10th July 2023

DECISION

2 Summary of Decision 1. On 10th July 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,050 per month to take effect from 7th May 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 6th April 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,150 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,000 per month to take effect from 7th May 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On the 2nd May 2023 the Tenant appealed to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 31st May 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. The tenant submitted representations to the Tribunal by a letter dated 1st May 2023 clearly setting the points raised. The letter was also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case 7th July 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on Rightmove and Google Maps, the property comprises a semi detached house in an area of similar style properties close to local amenities and Hersham main line station.

10. The house has the following accommodation: a Living Room and Kitchen at ground level, one Bedroom and a Bathroom at first floor level. There are gardens front and rear and a garage. Submissions 11. The tenancy began on the 7th March 2007 for a term of 12 months. The parties have provided very limited evidence in connection with the condition of the property and the Rent Appeal Statements have not been completed.

3 12. There is an Energy Performance Rating for the property which states the property is 37m2 and has an energy rating of C75 with double glazed windows and gas central heating. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal

(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy-

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.

(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and

4 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.

(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

Consideration and Valuation 13. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

14. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.

15. As previously mentioned, the parties have provided the Tribunal with only limited evidence and no comparable evidence. Therefore, the Tribunal had to make certain assumptions regarding specification and fittings, in the absence of any comparable evidence the Tribunal has utilized its own professional judgement and experience.

16. Having carefully considered the limited representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Walton on Thames the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,050 per month.

17. The parties have not made any representations in connection with the condition of the property and therefore this is the rent that will be applied.

18. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 19. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,050 per month.

20. The Tribunal directs that the new rent of £1,050 per month should take effect from 7th May 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice.

5

[NAME] 10th July 2023

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is set at a fair market rate.
  • Rent adjustments consider the property's condition.
  • Rent is adjusted based on the usability of the rooms.
  • Fair market rent excludes certain costs.
  • Rent adjustments account for specific conditions and responsibilities.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £1,050 per month for the assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant appealed the landlord's proposed rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided based on the Housing Act 1988, considering the property's location and market comparables.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered around the fair market rent for the property, considering its location and condition.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be able to challenge a proposed rent increase through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written representations from both the tenant and landlord were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they obtain permission.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.