First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to £1,800 per month after considering the property's condition and the tenant's financial situation, including hardship.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and their financial circumstances.
📖 What the law says
This section allows landlords to propose an increase in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. Landlords can serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. The section also specifies when further rent increases can be proposed.
This section provides tenants under assured tenancies the right to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. Applications can be made if the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and within six months of the tenancy beginning. Additionally, tenants can challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13(2) or 13A(2).
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and the tenant's financial situation.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to £1,800 per month, taking into account the property's condition and the tenant's financial situation, including hardship.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAB/MNR/2024/0017
Property : 17 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] : Mr [COUNSEL] of Objection : 1 December 2023
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 3 May 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,800 per calendar month with effect from 3 May 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 25 November 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,925 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,750 per month to take effect from 20 January 2024.
2. On the 1 December 2023 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Hearing
3. At the request of the Tenant a Video Hearing took place at 10am on the 3 May 2024. This was attended by both the Tenant and Mr [APPELLANT] on behalf of the Landlord. The parties did not request the Tribunal to inspect the property and the Tribunal were satisfied this was not required and relied on information provided by the parties together with its expert knowledge.
The Tenants Case
The Tenant stated that his starting point for a property in superior condition was £1890 per month and considers there should be an adjustment of £140 to reflect the condition of the property which sets the rent at the same level. This adjustment is due to the damp and mould in his daughter’s bedroom and the fact that the double glazed windows do not contain trickle vents. The Tenant made an application in connection with Hardship. He stated he is a single parent bringing up two children. He has a job in IT at a local school. He receives Universal Credit as top up and in his bundle of evidence was a recent bank statement.
The Landlords Case
The Landlord confirmed that in recent years that costs of maintenance and hiring contractors had increased dramatically and this must have a bearing on the proposed rent. Otherwise, he considered a market rent was in the region of £2,200 per month and the proposed rent of £1,925 lies below that figure and has been set to in order to continue the tenancy.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has had consideration to the written and verbal submissions provided by the tenant and the landlord.
Determination and Valuation
3
5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Dagenham area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £1,900 per month. Using our own expertise, we considered that deductions of £100 should applied to take into account the condition of the property. The property is suffering from damp and mould in the second bedroom. This reduces the figure to £1, 800 per month.
It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
6. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,8oo per calendar month.
Decision
7. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £1,800 per calendar month.
8. The Tribunal accepts the evidence provided by the Tenant in connection with Hardship and directs the new rent of £1,800 to take effect on the 3 May 2024.
9. Under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 – Determination of rent by a Tribunal 14(7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the appropriate tribunal may direct. In short, the provision allows the Tribunal to defer the date of increase to the date of determination.
Chairman: [NAME]: 3 May 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this
4 decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AB/MNR/2024/0017
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 17 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 9 Skylines Village, London, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1800 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3 May 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 December 2019
6. Length of the term or rental period 24 Months
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Part furnished but no inventory provided.
9. Description of premises A semi detached two storey ex local authority house: accommodation comprises 3 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, parking on frontage.
[NAME] of Decision 5th May 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Damp and Mould Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Issues
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition significantly affects its market value.
- The property is in disrepair.
- The rent reflects the open market value adjusted for the property's deficiencies.
- The property conditions are unsatisfactory.
- There is a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition and amenities of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to £1,800 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and the tenant's financial situation.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the person who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get their rent adjusted based on the property's condition and their financial situation.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property and the tenant's financial situation were important evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
