Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Damp and Mould Issues
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the rent from £2,193.97 to £1,870 per month because the property had significant damp and mould problems. The Tribunal took into account the property's condition when setting the new rent.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reduced rent if the property's condition significantly affects its market value.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the periods of the tenancy, the terms of the tenancy except for the rent amount, and any notices given under Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to the Act.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to damp and mould issues in the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a reduced rent of £1,870 per month due to damp and mould issues affecting the property's condition, adjusting from the proposed rent of £2,193.97 per month. The decision was made by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0614
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY] 78 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,870 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24 August 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24 February 2022
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A Victorian two storey mid terrace house. Accommodation comprises: three bedrooms, 2 living rooms, kitchen, lean-to utility room, ground floor bathroom/WC, rear garden.
[NAME] of Decision 3 February 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAK/MNR/2024/0614
Property : 8 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Objection : 12 August 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 3 February 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,870 per calendar Month with effect from 24 August 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 23 July 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,193.97 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,894.79 per month to take effect from 24 August 2024.
2. The Tenants application is dated the 12 August 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant together with photographs, the tenancy agreement and three short videos. The Landlord did not provide any written evidence.
The Inspection
5. The Tribunal members inspected the property on the 3 February 2025 in the presence of the tenant and his family. The property is a Victorian mid- terrace three-bedroom house located in an established road with rear garden. The property is suffering from chronic damp and associated mould to most rooms. The Tenant has recently completed redecoration of the rooms, but already the damp staining is reappearing. The level of mould in the photographic evidence could certainly be considered a health hazard. It is a microscopic fungus that grows in damp places and can cause respiratory illness. The cause of the damp and mould is usually a mixture of the tenants lifestyle and defects to the fabric of the building such as blocked gutters, rising damp to the brickwork and damaged flat roof.
Determination and Valuation
6. Firstly, having consideration of our expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Edmonton area, The Tribunal considers that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets and curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £2,2o0 per month.
7. The Tribunal now needs to adjust this rent to allow for the damp and mould to the internal walls, dated fittings and dilapidated flat roof over the ground floor bathroom. Using its own expertise the Tribunal considers that a deduction of £330 (approximately 15%) should be applied. This reduces the rental figure to £1,870 per month.
3
Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determines that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition is £1,870 per calendar month.
8. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,870 per month to take effect on the 24 August 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 3 February 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Condition Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Semi-Detached House in Hornchurch
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition and Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant's application to determine a market rent was accepted by the Tribunal.
- The property's chronic damp and mould, visible in most rooms, was considered a health hazard.
- The Tribunal determined that the property's dated fittings and dilapidated flat roof required a rent reduction.
- A deduction of £330, or approximately 15%, was applied to the market rent due to the property's condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the rent from £2,193.97 to £1,870 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, specifically the damp and mould issues.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the impact of damp and mould on the property's market value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to negotiate a reduced rent if their property has significant damp and mould issues.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, videos, and the tenancy agreement were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
