Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent to £2,500 per month because the property had significant issues like leaking showers and damp walls.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market, considering the condition of the property.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to the property's poor condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a reduced rent of £2,500 per month due to the property's poor condition, including leaking sanitary fittings and damp staining.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HS/LON/00AQ/MNR/2024/0167
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 67 [ADDRESS] ,[POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] JP
[RESPONDENT] 401A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 2,500 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 24th March 2024
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included.
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24th December 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period Statutory Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A 1930s built semi detached house with loft conversion, rear garden and off-street parking located in established road. Accommodation comprises: two living rooms, kitchen/breakfast room, 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms /shower rooms.cloakroom.
[NAME] of Decision 23rd October 2024
1
Case Reference
: LON/OOAQ/MNR/2024/0167
Property : 67 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 10 June 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] JP
Date of Summary Reasons
: 23rd October 2024
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £2,500 per calendar month with effect from 23th March 2024. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 6th February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £3,050 per month in place of the existing rent of £2,210 per month to take effect from 24th March 2024.
2. The Tenants application is dated the 21st March 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988.The Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The Tenant has lived at the property since 24th May 2015 under an Assured Shorthold Agreement of that date which was renewed on the 24th of December 2021.
6. This case was originally to be considered on the papers dated 18th September 2024. However, upon further consideration the Tribunal was of the opinion there was a dispute of facts regarding the use of the loft conversion, and as such, the application was not appropriate for determination on the papers and the matter was set down for an inspection.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal arrived at the property on the 23rd October 2024 at around 11.30am in the presence of the tenant.
Evidence
5. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the landlord and tenant together with comparable evidence from the landlord together with photographs.
6 The first matter for the Tribunal to consider is the allegation from the Tenant stating that the loft conversion can only be used as a study, as the shower fittings are leaking. The Tribunal has considered this matter and it found that this room can certainly be used as a bedroom as well as a study. The dormer window has double glazed windows which can be opened and provide adequate ventilation.
3
Determination and Valuation
7. Firstly, having consideration of the comparable evidence together with our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Hayes area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be £2,700 per month.
8. The Tribunal now needs to adjust this rent to allow for the poor internal condition of the property, the leaking sanitary fittings and damp staining to plasterwork. Using its own expertise upon the inspection, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of £200 should be applied. This reduces the rental figure to £2,500 per month.
Decision
9. The Tribunal therefore determines that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition is £2,500 per calendar month.
10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £2,500 to take effect on the 24th March 2024. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase and the Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship.
Chairman: [NAME]: 23rd October 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal determined a market rent of £2,700 per month for the property in its current condition.
- A deduction of £200 was applied due to the property's poor internal condition, leaking sanitary fittings, and damp staining.
- The new rent of £2,500 was directed to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £3,050 per month was not accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent was reduced to £2,500 per month due to the property's poor condition.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent after inspecting the property and finding issues like leaking showers and damp walls.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the property's condition warranted a lower rent was the most important.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get their rent reduced if the property conditions are poor.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and comparable evidence from the landlord were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
