VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent for a property due to its poor condition, adjusting the rent from £720 to £620 per month under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.

Topics

rent adjustmentproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The tribunal considers factors such as the condition of the property and disregards certain elements like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to account for the property's condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a property based on its condition, reducing the rent from £720 to £620 per month under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 35C [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] & Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [APPELLANT], 256 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 620.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28 March 2023

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 October 2015

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises First floor flat with 2 bedrooms.

[NAME] of Decision 4 May 2023

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 Property : 35c [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] L [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] [COUNSEL] & [NAME] [COUNSEL] : Ms [COUNSEL] [NAME] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :

4th May 2023

DECISION

CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

2 Summary of Decision 1. On 4th May 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £620 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.

3. On 23rd February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £670 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.

4. On 10th March 2023 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.

5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either specifically requested by the parties or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.

6. The Tribunal issued directions on 31st March 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

7. Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.

8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 4th May 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises one of 5 first floor flats situated above a small parade of lockup shops about 1.25 miles north of the centre of Plymouth, in a mainly residential area. All main amenities are within reasonable distance.

10. The accommodation is described as including a Living Room with adjoining Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. Outside there is a small terrace area and off-street parking.

11. Windows are double glazed and the accommodation has gas-fired central heating. White goods and carpets are included in the tenancy but curtains are provided by the Tenant.

12. The Energy Performance Rating is ‘E’, having been assessed on 31st August 2018 Submissions

CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

3 13. The initial Tenancy began on 28th October 2015. The Landlord’s Agent states that the Landlord pays £60 per month service charge for stair access lighting and cleaning.

14. The main elevations were re-rendered in June 2016 to provide additional insulation. The flat roof was recovered in November 2021 with an additional insulating material.

15. The Agent states that the flat was refurbished some 7 years ago before Mr [NAME] took up occupation but accepts that the fittings have worn since then. She also states that she has compared the property with the cheapest rent for similar properties in the area.

16. The Tenant states that the rent paid for numbers 29a and [ADDRESS], both similar flats, are both £400 per month.

17. The Tenant provided the Tribunal with photographs showing black mould growth at points inside the flat and referred to problems with a roof skylight. He submitted text and email messages from January 2020 onwards referring to repair issues required, for which the Landlord appears to have granted a rent reduction whilst issues were resolved.

18. The Tenant also submitted photographs taken more recently which showed general disrepair including ‘blown’ windows, poor decoration and deteriorating kitchen cupboards. Furthermore, the Tribunal was supplied with photographs showing the broken lights to the external staircase, poor external decoration, the car parking area with overgrown weeds, fly tipping and likely rodent infestations. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal (1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.

(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-

CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

4 (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his [NAME], or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his [NAME] being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-

(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.

Consideration and Valuation 19. The Tribunal is required to assess the rental value of the property as at today’s date.

20. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.

21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.

CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

5 22. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence, using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Plymouth, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £720 per month.

23. However, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made to the ‘open market’ rental figure to take account of the issues raised by the Parties. Internal repair and condition

£50 External repair and condition including common areas £50

____ TOTAL per month £100

24. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination 25. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £620 per month.

26. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £620 per month should take effect from 28th March 2023, this being the date specified in the notice.

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
  • A tenant can refer a landlord’s rent increase notice to the First-tier Tribunal.
  • The First-tier Tribunal must consider the condition of the property when determining fair market rent.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent that takes into account any improvements they have made.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided to adjust the proposed rent for a property based on its condition.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to reduce the proposed rent because the property was in poor condition.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that the property's condition warranted a lower rent was most important.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may be entitled to a rent adjustment if the property is in poor condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and emails showing the property's condition were significant.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

Yes, it is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.