First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal assessed the market rent for a rental property in Poole, determining it to be £191.54 per week based on written submissions and open market conditions. Adjustments were made for amenities provided by the tenant and the condition of the balcony.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed by a First-tier Tribunal based on open market conditions and relevant adjustments.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, the tribunal will determine the rent based on open market conditions, considering the periodic nature of the tenancy and excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property based on written submissions without holding an oral hearing.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property based on written submissions and open market conditions, adjusting for tenant-provided amenities and property condition. The decision took effect from April 3rd, 2023.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HP/MNR/2023/0106
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 5 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [COMPANY] C, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 191.54 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 03 April 2023
3. The amount included for services is £61.17 Per Week
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 23 March 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord n/a
8. Description of premises 2nd floor, 1 bedroom flat.
[NAME] of Decision 7 August 2023
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106 Property : 5 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [COUNSEL] (5) Limited Representative : Ms [COUNSEL] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] I [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision :
7th August 2023
DECISION
CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106
2
Summary of Decision
1. On 7th August 2023 Tribunal determined a market rent of £191.54 per month to take effect from 3rd April 2023.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 20th February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £163.39 per week which equates to £708.02 per month in place of the existing rent of £122.18 per week which equates to £529.45 per month to take effect from 3rd April 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 31st March 2023 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.
5. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued directions on 21st June 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 7th August 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property 9. From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a 2nd floor flat in a generally commercial area close to Poole Harbour. There are supermarkets within a short distance of the property supplying most day-to-day needs and the property is said to be within walking distance of the local High Street.
10. The flat is within a modern purpose built block of similar properties with accommodation described as including a Living Room/Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom. There is access via a lift.
CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106
3 11. Heating is from electric night storage heaters, windows are double glazed and the Energy Performance Certificate for the property is ‘B’. Submissions 12. The initial tenancy began on 23rd March 2018. The Tenant provides carpets, curtains and white goods. The total rent is expressed as an assured rental element plus a service charge element which is fixed annually. The Tenant says there is no off-street parking.
13. The Tenant states that the external cladding to the property has been replaced over recent months during which time he was unable to use the balcony accessed from his Living Room. The cladding works have been completed but the Tenant considers that his balcony has been left with a trip hazard and is therefore unsafe to use. He also says that a ‘supposed fire door’ is not fitted properly and that the area suffers from drug users, the homeless, vandalism and theft. Photographs of the balcony and door formed part of his submission to the Tribunal.
14. The Landlord says that the floor area of the flat is 48 square metres, and that the property was built in 2005, that it was provided to the Tenant in good order and that the Tenant has full rights to decorate the property to his own tastes.
15. The Landlord provided the Tribunal with a valuation from a Chartered Surveyor based in the area which assesses a market rent for the property to be £1,000 per month. The Law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106
4 (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
(a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
Consideration and Valuation
16. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
17. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy on the date the Tribunal is held, and that the Tribunal looks for evidence on the open market where rents are normally expressed on a monthly basis.
18. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.
CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106
5 19. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence, and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Bournemouth and Poole area, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £900 per month.
20. However, the property is not let in a condition that would be normal in the open market and a number of adjustments should be made to the monthly rent to reflect this.
21. Relying on its own expertise the Tribunal decided that this open market rent should be reduced by £30 per month to reflect the Tenant’s provision of white goods, £20 per month for carpets, £10 per month for curtains and £10 per month to reflect the condition of the balcony.
22.
Accordingly, the monthly rent is assessed at £830 per month which equates to £191.54 per week.
23. The Tribunal notes that this figure is higher than the rent assessed by the Landlord, but there is no compunction for the Landlord to charge this higher rent.
24. The Tribunal did not consider that the increase in rent taking effect from the date within the notice should cause undue hardship. Determination 25. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £191.54 per week.
26. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £191.54 per week should take effect from 3rd April 2023, this being the date specified in the Notice. The Landlord is not obliged to charge this higher rent.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
CHI/ooHP/MNR/2023/0106
6 3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Listed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Semi-Detached House in Buckfastleigh
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £800 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines New Market Rent for Listed Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,290 for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Residential Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed based on the open market conditions.
- The condition and improvements of the property should be considered when determining the fair market rent.
- A tenant can refer a landlord's rent increase notice to the First-tier Tribunal for a fair market rent determination.
- The First-tier Tribunal must consider the Housing Act 1988 when determining the fair market rent.
- Tenants are entitled to a fair market rent that reflects the property's current state and location.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property to be £191.54 per week.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the rental price of a flat.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on written submissions without an oral hearing, considering open market conditions and relevant adjustments.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the balcony and tenant-provided amenities influenced the final market rent determination.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rental dispute can seek a First-tier Tribunal determination based on open market conditions and relevant adjustments.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the balcony condition were submitted as part of the tenant's case.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
A person wishing to appeal must seek permission from the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of receiving written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult with a qualified solicitor for advice on your specific situation.
