First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent increase because the property had issues like water leakage and mold. The new rent is £1450 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the condition of the property, including any improvements or damages caused by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent increase due to the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent increase from £1750 to £1450 per month due to the property's condition, which included issues such as water leakage and mold.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. TR/LON/OOBB/MNR/2025/0850
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] C Piarroux JP
Landlord [NAME], Nine Mile Ride, Wokingham, Berkshire, [POSTCODE]
Tenant [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1450.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 22 October 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 13 June 2020
6. Length of the term or rental period
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord external structural
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Assorted furniture
9. Description of premises 2-bedroom flat with living room, kitchen and bathroom on seventh floor of purpose-built block
[NAME] of Decision 22 October 2025
1
Case Reference
: TR/LON/OOBB/MNR/2025/0850
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Landlord : [NAME] of Objection : 10 June 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] C Piarroux JP
Date of Full Reasons : 22 October 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1450 per month to be paid from 22 October 2025 under the Housing Act 1988 section 13. ____________________________________
Full REASONS
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 Background
1. On 12 May 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1750.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1350.00 per month to take effect from 13 June 2025.
2. An application dated 10 June 2025 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The application was accompanied by the Notice of Increase of Rent and, a copy of the tenancy agreement which was initially commenced on 13 June 2020 and extended by virtue of a Supplement Agreement dated 4 October 2021 for a period expiring 12 October 2022.
4. Directions were issued to the parties on 30 July 2025.
Inspection
5. The Tribunal did inspect the property on the same day as the hearing and found the flat to be contained in local authority block of seven floors. The building is constructed of concrete. The communal parts are in reasonable repair but modest, there is a lift which serves the block which was functioning. The flat itself is on the seventh floor and overlooks London City Airport. The flat has UPVC double glazing, the double glazing is relatively old, and no trickle vents were noted. The flat has a central hallway from which there are two bedrooms, a kitchen and a bathroom. The bathroom contains a bath with overhead shower, with mixer taps, WC and basin. The kitchen units are in poor condition. The living room has a part enclose that formerly was a balcony, there is evidence of some water leakage. The ceiling in some of the rooms shows also evidence of water leakage from the roof above. The property is centrally heated, there is evidence of black mould around the windows, additionally there are areas where some plaster has come away from the wall and minor cracking is also evident.
Hearing
6. Present at the hearing were; the applicant [APPELLANT] [NAME] and for the respondent [APPELLANT] [NAME] the Team Manager and [RESPONDENT] the property manager.
Preliminary matters
7. The [NAME] first, requested on the day before the hearing to convert the hearing into a hybrid hearing for their attendance, second, on the same day the [NAME] requested the hearing be adjourned on the basis that the member of staff previously handling the case was no longer available. Third that evidence be submitted on the morning of the hearing and whether evidence could be submitted after the hearing. The tribunal agreed to conversion of the hearing to a hybrid hearing; however, the landlord's representative had been notified of the hearing on 9 October 2025, and the tribunal refused the application for adjournment. In respect of the request for late submission of evidence, the request to submit evidence on the morning of
3 the tribunal and subsequent to the tribunal would have put the Applicant at a disadvantage and so the application to submit evidence was refused.
Submissions
Applicant Tenant
8. The Applicant tenant provided several documents to the tribunal including a possession order by the County Court of Clerkenwell and Shoreditch. The application details that, council tax and water rates are the responsibility of the tenant. The property comprises a flat located on the 7th floor, comprising two bedrooms, one living room, a bathroom, and a kitchen. The application form noted the property came with one double bed, one single bed, two wardrobes, two chests of drawers, two bedside drawers, one L-shaped sofa, one freezer, one washing machine, a cooker, an oven, and a kitchen table.
9. A copy of an eleven-page report entitled “Property visit” which is references the condition of the property as at 23 February 2023 completed by “[NAME]” an inventory company appointed by the landlord.
10. The Applicant tenant has also completed a Reply Form, noting the size of the property given as 741 square feet, and detailing each room and the tenant's concerns, in summary issues include; leaking, condition of kitchen, mould and functionality of bathroom.
11. Additionally, there are several documents recording the reporting of faults and accompanying photographs, including video evidence.
12. There are copies of correspondence from Private Housing and Environmental Health team of London Borough of Newham which inform the tenant that they will address only the more severe cases of disrepair.
13. Copies of marketing details for two-bedroom properties are included showing asking rents from £1675 to £1700 per month.
14. The Applicant also provided a five-page document titled “Detailed Defence Against section 13 Rent Increase”. Applicant included copies of several reports of defects to the landlord.
Respondent Landlord
15. [RESPONDENT] of the landlord [NAME] contacted the tribunal on 12 September 2025 wanting to discuss the case, no further submissions were received prior to the hearing.
Analysis and Valuation
16. The Notice of Increase dated 12 May 2025 proposes an increase to £1750.00 per month from 13 June 2025.
4
17. The tribunal has heard submissions from the Applicant on the level of rent the property would attract if in a good tenantable condition.
18. The tribunal in consideration of these submissions and using its own expertise determines £ 1600.00 per month given the age and nature of the block that contains the flat.
19. However, the tribunal has heard and saw on inspection, that the flat exhibits several issues and for these the tribunal deducts £ 150 per month. The tribunal determines a rent of £1450 per month.
Undue Hardship 20. The tenant has provided within their papers, a letter from London Borough of Newham following an application for discretionary housing payment and evidence of being in receipt of Universal Credit. The tribunal finds that an increase of rent backdated, in this case £100 per month over four months would cause undue hardship and so determines the date of the increase to be that of the hearing which is 22 October 2025. Decision 21. The Tribunal determines £ 1450 per month from 22 October 2025 in accordance with section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 [NAME]: [NAME]: 22 October 2025
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for a Flat with Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in a state of disrepair.
- Improvements made by the tenant are considered in setting the rent.
- Rent adjustments reflect the current market conditions.
- Rent determinations consider the actual condition and value of the property.
- Comparative rents in the area influence the decision.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent increase from £1750 to £1450 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court inspected the property and considered the condition, deciding to reduce the rent due to issues like water leakage and mold.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, which was substandard.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may be able to negotiate a lower rent based on the condition of the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs, videos, and reports of the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
