VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Under Housing Act 1988

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a new monthly rent of £2000.00 for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and value. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent determination that reflects the actual condition and value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyhousing act

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to propose increases in rent through a notice in a prescribed form. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specific time frame, which varies based on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and that more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy under the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £2000.00 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account the property's condition and value.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. FR/LON/00AG/MNR/2025/0877

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 132 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT] [NAME] n/k

Tenant [APPELLANT] and [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 2000.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 July 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable n/a Per n/a

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 27 December 2015

6. Length of the term or rental period 12 months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs landlord

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord The property came furnished with one bed, one wardrobe, gas cooker, fridge and washing machine.

9. Description of premises Split level, one bedroom, one living room, a bathroom and kitchen flat in local authority block. With central heating.

[NAME] of Decision 16 December 2025

1

Case Reference

: FR/LON/00AG/MNR/2025/0877

Property : 132 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] represented by

[APPELLANT] [NAME].

Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 03 July 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [NAME] of hearing / Determination Full Reasons : 18 November 2025/ 16 December 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £2000.00 per month to be paid from 29 July 2025 under the Housing Act 1988 section 13. ____________________________________

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Full REASONS

Background

1. On 27 June 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2500.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £1742.00 per month to take effect from 29 July 2025.

2. An application dated 3 July 2025 was made under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The application was accompanied by the Notice of Increase of Rent and, a copy of the tenancy agreement which was initially commenced on 27 December 2015 to 26 December 2016 at an initial rent of £1742.00 per month, until reverting to a statutory periodic tenancy after the expiration of the contractual tenancy.

4. Directions were issued to the parties on 23 September 2025; the issue was determined following the hearing and subsequent inspection.

Inspection

5. The Tribunal did inspect the property. The property is fourth floor flat, comprising one living room, one bedroom, one kitchen and a bathroom. The flat is located in a purpose built 1930s social housing block. The flat is accessed through a communal door with entry phone. There is a lift also available. The split is split level the upper level on the contained in the roof. The entrance door leads to a small hallway from which is a kitchen. The kitchen is in fair but tired condition there are double glazed windows. Further off the hall is a living room again with double glazed windows and adequate number of electrical sockets. From the hall leads some stairs to the purpose-built upper floor, this is contained in the roof area of the building. The bathroom has a bath, WC and basin, and appears dated. There is a set of double-glazed windows, but no extractor fan. The building is solid brick construction and there is evidence of considerable condensation on the ceiling and associated mould. Adjoining the bathroom is a large purpose-built cupboard which has evidence of condensation and mould on the ceiling, adjoining this a further storage area. The bedroom for the flat is contained on this floor and has central heating radiators and double glazing. There is no carparking with the property.

Determination

6. Present at the inspection was the Tenant only. The Tribunal initially inspected the property after the hearing on the 18 November 2025. The Landlord was not present but had expressed a wish to be so. The Tribunal deferred making a determination until a new date was set for both the Tenant and the Landlord to

3 be present at the inspection. Before the second inspection could take place, the Tenant stated they did not wish the Landlord to be present at the inspection. The Tribunal has no power to compel attendance at an inspection. The Tribunal then on the basis that the Tribunal had previously inspected the property immediately after the previous hearing made their determination on the papers. Present at the hearing was the Landlord only, the Tenant having previously given notice to the Tribunal that they would not attend.

Submissions

Applicant Tenant

7. The Applicant Tenant provided several documents to the Tribunal including; an application form, a copy of the Notice of Increase of Rent, and a copy of the tenancy. The Application form dated 26 June 2025 noted, that the Landlord was responsible for repairs, and the property comprised a flat of one living room, one kitchen, and one bathroom. The property came furnished with one bed, one wardrobe, gas cooker, fridge and washing machine.

8. The Tenant noted in their application form, that they had painted the flat three times in the last ten years, changed the bathroom floor as previous was said to be rotten, changed the carpet in the corridor, steps, hallway, and purchased own sofa and dining table and chairs. The Landlord being responsible for external repairs.

9. The Tenant submitted a bundle of 44 pages, the contents of which are noted. In particular, at [31] details of properties said to be comparables, and details of allegations relating to gas safety certificates and washing machine repairs.

10. The comparable properties range in value from £1946 per month to £2249 per month. The Tenant has submitted a completed Reply Form, the contents of which are noted but include details of the accommodation, that the Landlord is said to have supplied the central heating noting new boiler fitted in 2023, double glazing, carpets and curtains, and white goods.

Respondent Landlord

11 The respondent Landlord has supplied a completed Reply Form, confirming that the central heating, double glazing, carpets and curtains and white goods were supplied by the Landlord. Additionally, the form notes the improvements, repairs the Landlord has carried out including, repainting and new washing machine, fridge, stove/cooker and microwave.

12. The Landlord notes the property has been operating at a loss for several years and includes copies of marketing details of properties said to be similar. The properties have links but no details of the letting amounts.

13. The Landlord described in the hearing the repairs and replacement of white goods that have been undertaken over the period of the [NAME]'s

4 occupancy. The Landlord contended with the level of rents in the area the proposed figure of £2500 per month was reasonable.

Analysis and Valuation

14. The Notice of Increase dated 27 June 2025 proposes an increase to £2500.00 per month from 29 July 2025.

15. The Tribunal has read the submissions in respect of rental level.

16. The Tribunal in consideration of these submissions and using its own expertise determines £2450.00 per month if it was in good tenantable condition.

17. The Tribunal must take the property as at the date of the Notice of Increase and disregarding any Tenant's improvements. However, the Tribunal has heard and saw on inspection, that the flat exhibits several issues, of concern is the level of condensation in the upper floor. The bathroom is dated and the kitchen functional but tired. The Tribunal deducts £450.00 per month resulting is a revised rent of £2000.00 per month.

Undue Hardship 18. The Tenant has not made an application under this ground. Decision 19. The Tribunal determines £2000.00 per month from 29 July 2025 in accordance with section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 Chairman: [NAME]: 16 December 2025

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must: a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

5 b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28 –day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28- day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property is in a state of disrepair.
  • The rent should reflect the current market conditions.
  • The rent must be determined according to the Housing Act 1988.
  • The rent should consider the property's condition and local rental values.
  • The rent should be adjusted based on the condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It decided on a new monthly rent of £2000.00 for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and value, reducing the proposed rent from £2500.00 to £2000.00.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and value of the property were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the actual condition and value of their property when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rental values mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.