VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Conditions

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a tenant after considering the condition and amenities of the property. The rent was increased from £633.10 to £855.00 per month, effective from April 1st, 2024.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the condition and amenities of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent adjustment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the condition and amenities of the property, considering factors such as the property's state and any improvements made.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on property conditions and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent for a tenant based on the condition and amenities of the property, taking into account reported cockroach infestations and lack of furniture.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0130

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr A Harris [COMPANY] The Hive, [ADDRESS], Wembley, [POSTCODE]

Tenant Miss [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 852.31 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 April 2024

*3. The amount included for services is/is

not applicable 0.00 Per n/a

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 September 2022

6. Length of the term or rental period 6 Months

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A single en suite room in a 6 bed cluster flat with shared amenities

Chairman A Harris Date of Decision 16 July 2024

1

Case Reference

: GB/LON/00AE/MNR/2024/0130

Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: Miss [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [COMPANY] of Objection : 4 March 2024

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr [NAME]

Date of Summary Reasons

: 16 July 2024

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £855.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 April 2024. ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

SUMMARY REASONS

Background

1. On 27 February 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £ 681.85 plus Council Tax of £31.21 in place of the existing rent of £ 633.10 excluding Council Tax per month to take effect from 1 April 2024.

2. On 4 March 2024 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 4 March 2024.

Inspection

3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.

Evidence

4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.

Determination and Valuation

5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in the condition and with the amenities the market would expect would be in the region of £950 per calendar month excluding Councilt Tax. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:

a. Reported cockroach infestation b. No furniture

6. The full valuation is shown below:

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £855.00 per calendar month exclusive of Council Tax .

PCM AST Market rent 950.00 £ less condition/terms 10.0% 95.00 -£ 855.00 £

3 Decision

8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £855.00 per calendar month.

9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £855.00 to take effect on 1 April 2024 This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase

10. The tribunal notes that the rent paid by the tenant is set at 80% of the market rent so that the rent payable becomes £684.00 or say £681.85 as per the landlords notice plus £31.21 Council Tax. The jurisdiction of the tribunal is limited to finding a market rent and it has no power over the any other matter.

Chairman: A Harris

Date: 16 July 2024

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant made improvements to the property.
  • The rent adjustment considers the property's condition.
  • The rent is adjusted based on market conditions.
  • The rent reflects the open market value of similar properties.
  • The rent takes into account the property's deficiencies.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent for a tenant based on the property's condition and amenities.

Who was involved?

A tenant disputed a proposed rent increase by their landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to adjust the rent upwards, considering the property's condition and amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair rent adjustment based on the condition and amenities of their property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the appeal provisions outlined in the judgment.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.