First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reviewed a request to adjust the rent for an assured tenancy. They considered the property's condition and market comparables and decided to set the rent at £900 per month, effective from December 6, 2021.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the condition of the property and market comparables.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal reviewed a notice of increase in rent for an assured tenancy and adjusted the rent based on the property's condition and market comparables. The decision took effect from 6th December 2021.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00MS/MNR/2021/0133
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr R Brown FRICS Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [NAME], 56 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 900.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 06 December 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 06 September 2019
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, curtains, sofa, 2 wardrobes, 3 bedside tables, chest of drawers, cooker, water heater and fridge.
8. Description of premises 6th floor centrally heated double glazed purpose built flat.
Chairman Mr R Brown FRICS Date of Decision 21 January 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00MS/MNR/2021/0133
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
[NAME] of Application : 25th October 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 21st January 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 21st January 2022 will be £900.00 per calendar month (pcm)with effect from 6th December 2021.
2. By an application dated 25th October 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 30th September 2021 proposed a rent of £890.00 pcm with effect from 6th December 2021, in place of the current rent of £850.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 28th August 2019. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 14th December 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a mixed residential area overlooking the railway line.
8. The property comprises a 6th floor centrally heated double glazed purpose built flat.
9. The accommodation comprises: 1 reception room/kitchen, 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms (1 en-suite). Outside: Communal parking and laundry.
10. The property is let part furnished: Carpets, curtains, Sofa, 2 wardrobes, 3 bedside tables, chest of drawers, cooker, water heater and fridge.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected. Heating, hot water and communal cleaning are included in the rent
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 14th December 2021.
14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application and Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and 2 Tenancy Agreements.
3
Landlord's Representations (summarised): 16. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments:
a) Southampton Central Station is 0.3 miles away within walking distance and on bus route. The city centre is under 0.5 miles.
b) Advertisements of comparables are included: 1) Martins: No address. 2 Bedroom Flat: £900.00 pcm. 2) Pearsons: No address. 2 Bedroom Flat: £1,200.00 pcm. 3) [NAME]: [NAME]. 2 Bedroom Flat: £950.00 pcm. 4) [NAME]: [ADDRESS]. 2 Bedroom Flat: £950.00 pcm
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised)
17. In the Application and Reply Forms the [APPELLANT] says: a) The location is central but above the railway and intersection of [ADDRESS]. b) The kitchen sink overflows into the bath tub. The maintenance man said the pipework needed to be changed. c) The water heater in the main bathroom has been out service for more than a year. d) The humidity in the en-suite is causing the shower base to rot. e) The kitchen extractor does not work properly. f) Only one of the two lifts is working. g) The central heating on at certain times only and is not governed by the outside temperature. h) The bathroom (waste) plunger has been used by the maintenance man to block the breather pipe. i) The communal washing machines have been replaced but there is only one dryer for 40 families
18. Communal cleaning is not undertaken regularly. The parking area is full of rubbish.
19. Photographs of the flat and location are included.
20. The following properties (similar in location and quality) are available to let: a) [ADDRESS]14: 2 Bedroom Flat: £745.00 pcm. b) [ADDRESS]: 2 Bedroom Flat: £825.00 pcm. c) [ADDRESS]14: 2 Bedroom Flat £850.00 pcm. d) SO14: 2Bedroom Flat £795.00 pcm.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 21. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
22. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
4
23. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 27th July 2028. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
24. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
25. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating above F and including hot water and heating would be £950.00 pcm.
26. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property (as shown in the Landlord's photographs) determined to make deductions in respect of those issues identified by the [APPELLANT]:
a) General disrepair (Plumbing, hot water, laundry facilities, lift failures and extraction) 25.00pcm b) Irregular heating over which the [NAME] has no time control : £25.00pcm
27. Accordingly the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £900.00 pcm.
28. The rent will take effect from 6th December 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 29. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
30. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
5
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £400 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Disrepair Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Social Housing Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Unconventional Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £500 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant was entitled to a rent adjustment because the property's condition was a significant factor in its market value.
- The Tribunal made deductions for general disrepair, including plumbing, hot water, laundry, lift failures, and extraction issues.
- The Tribunal made deductions because the heating was irregular and the tenant had no control over its timing.
- The Tribunal considered the landlord's photographs of the property when determining the deductions.
- The Tribunal used its expert knowledge and market evidence to determine a fair market rent for a modernized property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the rent for an assured tenancy to £900 per month, effective from December 6, 2021.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the case.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the market comparables.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get their rent adjusted based on the condition of the property and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as photographs of the property and advertisements of comparable properties mattered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
