First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £685.00 per month based on the property's condition and market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent set by the Tribunal based on market conditions and the property's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property in the open market, taking into account the periodic nature of the tenancy and excluding certain factors like improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's condition, setting the rent at £685.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0094
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 24A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] (Mr [NAME]) Address 37 St. Margaret’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 685.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 09 September 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 09 May 2015
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, cooker and washing machine.
8. Description of premises Double glazed, centrally heated flat over a shop.
[NAME] of Decision 26 October 2021
1
Case Reference
: CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0094
Property : 24A [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 12th August 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] Mr C Davies FRICS
Date
: 26th October 2021
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 26th October 2021 in the sum of £685.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application dated 12th August 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 31st July 2021 proposed a rent of £685.00 pcm with effect from 9th September 2021, in place of the current rent of £550.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and commenced on 9th May 2015. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 23rd September 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property appears to be located above a shop in a pedestrian shopping street.
8. The property comprises a double glazed centrally heated maisonette on three floors accessed via an external staircase. Off street parking.
9. The accommodation comprises: on the Lower Floor: Entrance Hall. First Floor: 1 reception rooms and kitchen. Second Floor: 2 bedrooms, bathroom and w.c.
10. Carpets, cooker and washing machine are included in the Tenancy.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 23rd September 2021.
14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form including photographs.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application Form but no other representation.
Landlord's Representations (summarised): 16. The Landlord says in the Reply Form:
3
a) The property was refurbished between July 2020 and January 2021. b) The work included: re-flooring, re-plastering, re-decoration and a new bathroom installed. c) The kitchen fittings were not renewed as in good condition but the flooring, cooker and tiling were replaced. d) The property is located in the heart of Folkestone and within walking distance of the Railway Station. e) The Landlord considers that the market rent should be £785.00 pcm. However to assist the [APPELLANT] a rent of £685.00 pcm is proposed. f) The Landlord had researched the market and found that similar rents indicated £700.00 pcm. Very few of those included parking. [COMPANY] let a similar but smaller property in nice condition 'just down the road' for £695.00 pcm in July.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised) 17. Apart from the Application Form the [APPELLANT] makes no representations.
18. No representations are made about the level of the rent proposed by the Landlord.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
22. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 11th October 2029. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in a suitable condition for letting having recently undergone major refurbishment as described in paragraph 16 above.
24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition
4
with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating above F would be £685.00 pcm.
25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition of the subject property, determined that the market rent at £685.00 pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 9th September 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the [NAME] which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal [NAME] to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy: Case Summary
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Neglected Property Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £500 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared House Room at £500.00 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent determination reflecting the property's condition and market value.
- The tenant can challenge a landlord's proposed rent increase under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- The tribunal sets rent based on current market conditions and the property's condition.
- Rent adjustments must consider the property's condition and market comparables.
- Reasonable rent is determined based on market standards and the property's condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No significant factors leading to dismissal in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £685.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the market conditions were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set based on the property's condition and market conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
