Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared House Room at £500.00 PCM
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for a room in a shared house. They set the rent at £500.00 per month, considering factors like the property's condition, amenities, and location.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord could reasonably expect to receive for renting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and amenities, among other factors.
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 imposes repairing obligations on landlords for short leases. It requires landlords to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, in repair and proper working order. Additionally, landlords must ensure that installations for space heating and heating water are also maintained properly.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for a room in a shared house at £500.00 pcm based on market conditions and the property's features.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for a room in a shared house at £500.00 pcm, considering the property's location, condition, and amenities. The Tribunal also took into account the landlord's repairing obligations under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00ML/MNR/2021/0116
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT] [COMPANY], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 500.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 November 2021
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 28 February 2020
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Furniture to common areas.
8. Description of premises Attic room in a shared house. Rent includes Council Tax, Water, Gas, Electricity, Cleaner and Gardener.
[NAME] of Decision 30 November 2021
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00ML/MNR/2021/0116
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
: 4th October 2021
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act
1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 30th November 2021
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 30th November 2021 in the sum of £5oo.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application received on 4th October 2021, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 30th September 2021 proposed a rent of £530.00 pcm with effect from 1st November 2021, in place of the current rent of £500.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The [APPELLANT] says the tenancy began on the 28th February 2020 a fact not disputed by the Landlord. However the agreement, supplied with the application, which is in standard form commenced on 1st March 2021. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 10th September 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located on busy main road running East West through the town.
8. The property comprises a room in a centrally heated double glazed house comprising 7 letting rooms on three floors and shared facilities which include: kitchen/living room, 2 communal bathrooms and WCs. Outside: garden and off street parking.
9. The accommodation comprises an attic room with shared facilities for cooking and washing (washing machine, cooker and fridge).
10. Carpets and curtains are included and the common areas are furnished.
11. On the information before the Tribunal it appears that that the room rent includes council tax, gas, water, electricity, broadband, fortnightly cleaner and occasional gardener.
12. The Tribunal is informed that all mains services are connected.
Hearing 13. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 14. Tribunal Directions dated 13th October 2021.
3
15. Landlord: Did not complete the Reply Form or make submissions.
16. [APPELLANT]: Application Form, Notice of Increase, Tenancy Heads of Terms, Reply Form and photographs.
Landlord's Representations (summarised): 17. None.
[APPELLANT]'s Representations (summarised) 18. In the Application and Reply Form the [APPELLANT] says:
a) The property is in quite nice condition save for some worn furniture.
b) The kitchen and bathroom are in good condition.
c) Railway station within a 10 minute walk.
d) The room is small with a sloping ceiling.
e) There is one other room in the house let at £500.00 pcm but it is more spacious with a side window.
d) Attached are photos of the [APPELLANT]'s room and the other room which show it to be larger.
e) Attached are some comparable but double rooms (some en-suite) available on [NAME] taken on 18th October 2021 at rents between £475.00 and £530.00 pcm.
f) In the application the [APPELLANT] says that there is no separate charge for services.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The Tribunal does not take into consideration the personal circumstances of the Landlord or [APPELLANT] in making its determination (including issues between Landlord and [APPELLANT] which do not affect the rental value of the property itself).
20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice of rent increase was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
21. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at C expiring on 21st August 2029. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.
22. Based on the knowledge of its members, the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
4
23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property (a room in a shared house) in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
24. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. The Tribunal noted the parties comments on the comparables and the accommodation provided. In particular the Tribunal noted the cramped nature of the room with the space compromised by the sloping attic ceiling. Having done so, it concluded that a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, curtains, all white goods and an EPC Rating above F would be £500.00 pcm. The Tribunal makes a finding of fact that the subject property was a similar modernised property in fair condition.
25. The Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £500.00 pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 1st November 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
5
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Neglected Property Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £500 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Set at £850.00 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £700.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared Flat at £715 Per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant challenges a rent increase based on the property's condition and amenities.
- The tenant requests a rent level reflecting the open market value of the property.
- The tenant invokes Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to challenge the rent increase.
- The tenant asks for a rent determination that considers the property's market value and condition.
- The tenant seeks a reasonable rent based on market standards and the property's state.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's request for a rent determination is not supported by additional factors beyond the open market value.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a room in a shared house was set at £500.00 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, taking into account its condition and amenities.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and amenities of the property were crucial in determining the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent at £500.00 pcm.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation might use this decision to argue for a fair rent based on the property's condition and amenities.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
