Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy based on the current market conditions and the property's features. The decision was made by Mr. a person.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property, considering its condition and amenities.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, such an application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. When an application is made, the tribunal will determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy based on market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy based on market conditions, amenities, and the property's condition. The decision was made by Mr. N Martindale in the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0691
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT], 5-11 Green Lanes, [ADDRESS], London, [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1500 Per pcm
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3 December 2024
*3. The amount included for services is 200 Per Calendar month
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 30 January 2019
6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises Purpose Built Offices 1980’s, since converted post 2000 into small studio flats. Located in Enfield Town adjacent railway station and bus routes. Block is on 4 levels excluding any basement. Brick wall finish, lead mansard roofing to 4th floor. Flat is a single room/ kitchen with shower/Wc. C. 23m2 GIA on first floor. Double glazed windows. On road parking restrictions no off street parking. Lift in block. Underfloor heating provide and paid for by the landlord, cost reflected in the rent, taken at £200 pcm. The Landlord is may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure shown at box 1.
[NAME] of Decision 27 January 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0691 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative : None Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
[NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 27 January 2025
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application, undated but received prior to the effective date (3 December 2024), from the [APPELLANT] of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 9 October 2024, proposed a new rent of £1500 per calendar month, with effect from and including 3 December 2024. The passing rent was said to be £995 per calendar month.
2 3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided.
4 Directions were issued 28 November 2024 by [NAME]. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections.
5 The Tribunal received an initial application. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and [APPELLANT].
6 The Tribunal carefully considered and noted such representations as it received from both parties regarding the location layout size and condition of the Property and other available and let comparable properties in the location.
Property
7 The Property is a post 2000 conversion from a subdivision of the former purpose built office block of 4 levels plus any basement dating from the 1980’s. Brick fair faced external walls and a mansard metal faced roof/ fourth floor. Windows are double glazed. Accommodation in the Property on the first floor, comprised 1 bedroom/ living room/ kitchen and bathroom/ wc. The landlord provided under floor heating at its expense, the cost being included within the rent. There is a passenger lift to all levels. It was some 23m2 GIA, let with curtains, and a fitted kitchen and white goods.
8 The Tribunal had regard to Google Streetview (data capture October 2020). The [APPELLANT] provided details of other small studio flats in the block currently reported to let as well as others said to be let earlier in the year. These ranged by value: February 2024 £1100 & £1125 pcm, through August 2024 £1175 & £1200 pcm. There was no mention of the provision of underfloor heating to the tenants. The landlord provided details of other small studio flats of very similar GIA, in this building; No.5, 8, 3, on new rents from October 2024 at £1500 pcm said to include the cost of heating.
Law
9 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to [APPELLANT]’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the [APPELLANT]’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the Property to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
3 Decision
10 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Enfield Town it determines that the subject Property would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1,500 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order including the full costs of the provision of the underfloor heating and its constant availability to the [APPELLANT] ascribing the fixed cost of £200 pcm to this element. The Tribunal makes no deductions. The rent of this Property is therefore determined at £1,500 pcm, inclusive of the cost of underfloor heating.
11 The new rent will take effect from and including 3 December 2024, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. As the Form of Determination states: The Landlord is not obliged but, may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of, the figure shown at box 1; £1500 pcm.
Name: [NAME]: 27 January 2025
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
4 If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy in Luton
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Norwich Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Tenant Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Property Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1000 pcm for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenant Based on Local Market Rates
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,750 per Month
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should reflect the open market value of the property.
- The rent should be adjusted based on the property's condition.
- The rent should take into account the amenities of the property.
- The rent should be determined by the First-tier Tribunal based on local market rates.
- The rent should be decided under section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured shorthold tenancy was set at £1500 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market conditions and the property's features, including the underfloor heating provided by the landlord.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's rent with similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting the rent at £1500 per calendar month.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should gather evidence of comparable rents in the area to support their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of comparable rents in the area and details of the property's features were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
