VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Tenant Based on Local Market Rates

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent increase after considering the a person's condition and comparing it to similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

The rent for a property should be determined based on what a willing landlord might reasonably expect to receive in the open market under an assured tenancy, as per the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent adjustments

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section allows landlords to propose rent increases for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. Landlords can serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. The section also specifies when further rent increases can be proposed.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

This section permits tenants under assured tenancies to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market under similar conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on market conditions and the condition of the property, reducing the rent from £2,200 to £1,900.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal reviewed a notice of rent increase and determined a new rent based on the property's condition and local market rates under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : LON/00AK/MNR/2025/1014 [NAME] : 34 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted] : None Respondent : [redacted] (Landlord) Representative : [RESPONDENT]. Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :

[NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 3 February 2025

REASONS FOR DECISION

Background

1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application form dated 7 October 2025 from the tenant of the [NAME], regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).

2 The notice, dated 12 September 2025, proposed a new rent of £2,200 per calendar month with effect from and including 3 November 2025. The passing rent was said to be £1,700 per calendar month.

2

3 The tenancy is an assured periodic calendar monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided. It was said to have run originally from 3 March 2016.

4 Directions dated 8 December 2025 were issued inviting representations on the substantive issue of the new rent. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections.

5 The Tribunal carefully considered and noted such representations as it received from both parties and the location layout size and condition of the [NAME] and other available and let comparable properties nearby.

6 The tenant mentioned that they had repaired an outside shed and pergola in the rear garden, previously damaged by wind. The tenant also replaced the rear fence at their expense to one side of the rear garden. The tenant’ photographs also showed a replaced bathroom and kitchen and renewed decorations, moving the [NAME] from simply functional to better finished.

7 The tenant referred to the house as having only 2 bedrooms, the 3rd bedroom being unusable as it was said to be too small to be habitable. The [APPELLANT] submitted advertised details listed August 2025 of 2 bedroom terraced houses to let. One was from postal district Edmonton N9 to the south, another from Enfield Town EN1 to the west, but the remainder were from the [ADDRESS] or Enfield Wash EN3 areas. These were all described and built as 2 bedroom houses. Most were like the [NAME] built in the 1920’s. Rents ranged from £1800 pcm to £1900 pcm for these 2 bedroom houses.

[NAME]

8 The [NAME] is a small 2 level 1920’s terraced house, itself within an established residential estate of similar roads within [NAME]. Accommodation within the house is of 3 bedrooms (2 small doubles plus a small single), bathroom/ wc, 2 reception rooms and kitchen on the ground level. There is a rear garden and a front paved driveway for 1 car. On road parking is restricted. The building has part rendered part painted brick front wall and a double pitched roof finished to double lap clay tiles over. (Google Streetview September 2022). Windows are early style PVCu framed double glazed. The heating is not stated. White goods and a double bed were provided. Carpets and curtains are not mentioned. The Tribunal assumes that [NAME] has been let and maintained in fair condition but notes the improvements undertaken without obligation on them, by the tenant.

Law

9 In accordance with the terms of S14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord,

3 under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the [NAME] falls to be valued as it stands; assuming it to be in reasonable internal decorative condition.

Decision

10 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in the eastern side of [NAME] determines that the subject [NAME] would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £2,100 pcm, fully fitted and in good order. Locally, three bedroom homes start at around £2,300, two bedroom homes, at about £1800 pcm. The tenant is not required to refurbish but only make good, fair and wear and tear excepted. The tenant appears to have done more than required. The kitchen and bathroom must also be assumed as the original, functional only as not as the currently appear. For these factors the Tribunal makes a deduction of £200 pcm. The house is small for a 3 bedroom house but does have the additional room over the houses advertised as simply 2 bedroom. [APPELLANT] prefer to provide their own furniture, others prefer the landlord to supply same.

11 The new rent will therefore be £1,900 per calendar month with effect from 3 November 2025. The Landlord is not obliged to charge this sum and may charge a significantly lower rent as a result of their own choice, policy, or governmental regulation. They may not however, charge a rent in excess of it.

Name: N. [NAME]: 3 February 2025

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.

Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rule 2013).

4 If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.

The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AK/MNR/2025/1014

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 34 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [APPELLANT]

Tenant [APPELLANT] and [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1900 Per Cal month

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3 November 2025

*3. The amount included for services is Nil Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included N/A

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 3 March 2016

6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord White goods and double bed.

9. Description of premises The [NAME] is a 1920’s terraced house. Brick walls rendered to front, double pitched main roof in double lap tile, front ground floor monopitch roof to ground floor bay and porch. Exterior appears in fair condition. [NAME] comprises – 3 bedrooms, 2 living rooms, kitchen, bathroom/ wc. Front yard with 1 car space and rear garden, limited on street parking. The Landlord may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure shown at box 1.

[NAME] of Decision 3 February 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent adjustment reflects the property's condition and market comparables.
  • The rent adjustment considers minor defects in the property.
  • The landlord is granted dispensation from consultation requirements due to urgent works.
  • The rent reflects the open market value of the property under an assured tenancy.
  • The tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment that includes improvements made by the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent increase.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local market rates.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and local market rates.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should compare their property's condition and local market rates.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property and advertised rents for similar properties mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.