First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,050 PCM
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent level for an assured tenancy based on current market rates and the condition of the a person. After considering both parties' submissions and evidence, the tribunal set the new rent at £1,050 per calendar month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a reasonable rent level reflecting current market conditions, adjusted for any specific defects in the a person.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. The section also specifies when a new rent can be proposed again after previous increases.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the new rent for an assured tenancy based on market conditions and a person condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy in Newbury. The tribunal considered market conditions and property defects to set the rent at £1,050 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : CAM/00MB/MNR/2025/0815 [NAME] : 32 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] (Landlord) Representative : [NAME] of Application : S.13 Housing Act 1988 Determination of a new rent Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME]. [NAME] and venue of Meeting : 16 February 2026 First Tier Tribunal (Eastern) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 16 February 2026
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 11 December 2025, before the effective start date of the new rent sought, from tenant of the [NAME], regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 2 The notice, dated 5 November 2025, proposed a new rent of £1,200 per calendar month from and including 27 December 2025. This rent does not include other services.
3 The tenancy is an assured periodic calendar monthly tenancy succeeding an earlier fixed term lease, with effect from and including 27 July 2018. A copy was provided.
4 The rent payable from up to and including 23 January 2023 was said to be £996 per calendar month.
Directions
5 Directions, dated 16 December 2025 for the progression of the case, were issued by Legal [NAME]. Neither party asked for a hearing.
Inspection
6 There was no inspection. The [NAME] is a two bedroom, one bathroom flat with kitchen and living room. It is on an upper (second top) floor of a small low rise block (3 levels) constructed in the 1990’s. There are internal communal stairwells and external communal gardens (Google Streetview June 2018). There is a modern purpose built building on an estate of similar modern low rise blocks.
7 The building within which the [NAME] is located is finished to brick with double glazed windows and double pitched single lap tiled roof above. The surroundings are open space with landscaped car parking. It is assumed the tenant has use of a parking space on site. The accommodation is 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom WC with electrical storage heaters.
Tenants’ and Landlord’s Representations
8 The tenants provided written submissions via the Application Form and made a statement regarding the [NAME] and personal circumstances. The tenant states that he has experienced problems with disrepair historically including minor electrical, plumbing, shower, flooring, washing machine, and kitchen etc. defects.
9 The tenant provided brief details asking prices of similar modern flats locally which for similar accommodation appeared to show rents of between £1,100 to £1,200 pcm.
10 The landlord also provided brief details of asking prices of similar modern flats locally which for similar accommodation appears to show rents of between £1,150 to £1,200 pcm on the estate for 2 bedroom flats and £1,400 pcm elsewhere The landlord had offered a concession by staging the rent increase: £1,075 pcm from 27 December 2025; and limiting the rise onwards to £1,150 pcm from March 2026.
3
11 The Tribunal is grateful for such information as was provided by both parties in the application and standard Reply Forms and separate representations.
Law
12 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Act we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the [NAME] falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the [NAME] to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
13 From the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels sought and obtained in and around Newbury, it determines that the [NAME] would let on normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1,200 per calendar month including any fixed service charge fully fitted and in good order.
14 From the representations it found that the [NAME] had suffered from a series of minor defects but, that these had at the valuation date been resolved by the landlord. However the [NAME] only has electrical storage heating, rather than central heating; the carpets and white goods were worn, for which the Tribunal makes an allowance of £150 pcm. The new rent will be therefore be £1,050 pcm.
15 Although the tenant referred in passing to personal financial and health issues ongoing, there is limited scope within the law for the Tribunal to reflect such in the new level of rent to be set by delaying the effective start date. There was insufficient information to grant a concession and does not have power to extend concession beyond the decision date.
16 Although the landlord is not obliged to charge this rent and may charge a significantly lower rent as a result of their own choice, policy, or governmental regulation; however they may not charge more than these figures from their respective dates.
[NAME] 16 February 2026
4 Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £980 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Open-Market Rent for Property in Dartford
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's market rent, if fully fitted and in good order, would be £1,200 per calendar month.
- An allowance of £150 per calendar month was made due to the property having only electrical storage heating, worn carpets, and worn white goods.
- The tribunal's general knowledge of market rent levels in the area was used to determine the rent.
- The property was valued as it stands, assuming it to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined a new rent level for an assured tenancy based on market conditions and property condition.
Who was involved?
A tenant and the landlord were involved in setting a new rent level for a property in Newbury.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered current market rates and the specific condition of the property to set an appropriate rent level.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied in determining the new rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property, including minor defects and heating type, influenced the final rent level set by the Tribunal.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially in favour of the tenant as it resulted in a lower rent than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair assessment based on current market rates and property condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Market rental prices, property condition reports, and tenant statements were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party may apply for permission to appeal if they are dissatisfied with the decision within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
