First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) reviewed a proposed increase in rent for an assured tenancy property. After considering factors like the property's condition and location, the tribunal set a new market rent of £2,520 per quarter starting June 24th, 2026.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord's proposed rent increase must reflect the actual condition and location of the property when compared to similar properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
This section allows landlords to propose rent increases for assured periodic tenancies, provided they follow certain procedures and timing requirements outlined in the statute.
This section permits tenants to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy by applying to an appropriate tribunal, which then determines the open-market rent based on various considerations.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property, considering various factors affecting rental value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property, considering various factors such as location, condition, and amenities. The new rent was set at £2,520 per quarter from June 24th, 2026.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
HAV/00HE/MNR/2026/0028
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
None
Landlord
[APPELLANT]
Landlord’s Address
Landlord’s Representative
None
Date of Application
1st February 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Decision
23rd April 2026
Rent Determined
£2,520 per quarter
Date the new rent takes effect
24th June 2026
HAV/00HE/MNR/2026/0028 2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 13th January 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,500 per quarter, equating to £833.33 per month, in place of the existing rent of £2,300 per quarter, equating to £766.66 per month.
2. Market rents are usually quoted on a monthly basis.
3. On 1st February 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
4. The assured tenancy commenced in February 1999 by succession.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
5. None.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
6. None.
Liability for Council Tax
7. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
8. None
Inspection/Hearing
9. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
HAV/00HE/MNR/2026/0028 3
The Property
10. The Property a semi-detached house comprising 2 living rooms, kitchen, 3 bedrooms, bathroom with wc, utility and store. The utility and store are unheated. Outside there are gardens to front and rear.
Evidence
11. Both the Tenant and the Landlord submitted evidence.
The Tenant.
12. The Tenant made the following comments and provided a number of supporting photographs.
a) The property is situated in a predominantly industrial area. b) The property was improved in 1999 including double glazing and night store heating. c) There have been a number of historic management issues. d) The main bedroom floor was left in poor condition. e) The night store heating is old. f) Access is via a track in poor condition and there is no parking space. g) An adjoining property is used as a base for asbestos removal. h) The Tenant provides carpets curtains and white goods.
The Landlord
13. The Landlord made the following pertinent comments:
a) The Landlord does not have ownership or control of the access road. b) The Tenant chooses to live in that area. c) The Landlord has discounted the asking rent to reflect the heating.
14. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,300 per month.
15. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods, flooring and curtains provided by the landlord.
16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:
HAV/00HE/MNR/2026/0028 4
a) Location and access. b) Tenants provision of white goods. c) Tenants provision of carpets and curtains d) Poor heating e) Dated bathroom f) Dated kitchen g) General wants of repair.
The full valuation is shown below:
Starting Rent
£1.300 pcm
Less a) Items given under a) above
£200 b) Items given under b) above
£30
c) Items given under c) above
£50 d) Items given under d) above
£50 e) Items given under e) above
£50 f) Items given under f) above
£50 g) Items given under g) above
£30 Total deduction per month
£460
Market rent
£840 pcm
Undue hardship
17. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination. No application has bee received in respect of hardship
Decision
18. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £2,520 per quarter with effect from 24th June 2026.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to
HAV/00HE/MNR/2026/0028 5
this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent After Tenant Dispute
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £825 pcm for Oldbury Flat
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant providing white goods, carpets, and curtains reduced the market rent
- General repair needs further reduced the rent
- The tribunal’s expert assessment of £1,300 pcm for a modernized property was accepted
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord’s proposed rent of £2,500 per quarter was rejected
- The landlord’s claim that the property’s condition was comparable to others was rejected
- The landlord’s argument about the tenant choosing to live in the area was not accepted as a factor
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property at £2,520 per quarter.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the proposed rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered various factors such as property condition and location to determine the market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in determining the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The property's condition, location, and amenities compared to similar properties influenced the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's case was partially successful as the new rent was lower than initially proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase should consider factors like property condition and location when challenging the proposed rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property's condition and expert knowledge on rental values were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party can appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if there is a point of law at issue.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It's advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for specific guidance on your situation.
