Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Repairs
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent of a property from £2,400 per month to £2,300 per month after considering the condition of the house and similar properties in the area. The tenant argued that there were repair issues which affected the rental value.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent adjusted based on the condition of the property and comparable rental values in the area.
📖 What the law says
This section allows landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. Landlords can serve a notice proposing a new rent, which must take effect at least two months after the notice is served. The notice can also be served under certain conditions related to previous rent increases.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided that the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13(2).
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a modern terraced house in Dartford, adjusting it from £2,400 pcm to £2,300 pcm due to repair issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a modern terraced house in Dartford, adjusting it from £2,400 pcm to £2,300 pcm due to repair issues and comparable rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
HAV/29UD/MNR/2026/0015
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
Mr [COUNSEL]
Tenant’s Representative
None
Landlord
Mr [COUNSEL]
Landlord’s Address
Landlord’s Representative
None
Date of Application
4th January 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] of Decision
23rd April 2026
Rent Determined
£2,300 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
21st January 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 14th December 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,400 per calendar month (“pcm”) in place of the existing rent of £2,100 pcm to take effect from 21st January 2026.
2. On 4th January 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 21st May 2023. The rental period is monthly.
4. The Tenant submitted that, as the Landlord had served a notice for possession of the property the s13 Notice of Rent Increase was invalid.
5. The Tenancy is in the names of [NAME] and [NAME]. On 17th April 2026 [NAME] [NAME] confirmed to the Tribunal that [NAME] had authority to act on their behalf.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
6. None.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
7. None.
Liability for Council Tax
8. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
9. None
3
Inspection/Hearing
10. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
The Property
11. The Property is a modern terraced house with accommodation on 3 levels. A floor plan suppled shows a hall, living room/kitchen, cloakroom with wc, 4 bedrooms, study, bathroom with wc and ensuite shower room with wc. Outside there is a garden and an off-road parking space.
Evidence
12. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned submissions to the Tribunal. The Tenant included a number of photographs and the Tribunal was provided with a copy of the inventory taken at the beginning of the tenancy in May 2023.
The Tenant.
13. The Tenant made the following comments:
a) The Tenant stated that there are some broken buckets/drawers in the freezer, a window that is permanently locked and faulty double-glazed doors that do not seal completely and a broken oven.
b) The Tenant states that there has been a recurring mice infestation and historic prolonged leaks/disrepair which prompted a referral to the Local Authority Housing Department.
c) The Housing officer understood that a pest control professional had been to the house and had found no evidence of mice.
The Landlord
14. The Landlord made the following comments:
a) The Landlord states that nearby comparable properties are advertised at asking rents between £2,400 pcm and £2,600 pcm.
4
b) The Landlord states that the independent inventory confirms that the property was in good condition and professionally cleaned at the commencement of the tenancy.
Determination and Valuation
15. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £2,400 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.
16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made an adjustment of £100 per month to reflect general wants of repair.
Undue hardship
12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
13. The Tenant has asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case. He says he will otherwise be caused undue hardship but has provided no evidence of his financial circumstances.
14. The Landlord did not respond to the Tenant’s application for postponement due to hardship.
Decision
15. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £2,300 per calendar month with effect from 21st January 2026, this being the date specified in the Notice.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28
5
days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The market rent for a modernised property in good order in the area would be £2,400 per month.
- An adjustment of £100 per month was made to the market rent due to general repair needs.
- The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
- The tenant is responsible for paying Council Tax for the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's claim that the rent increase notice was invalid due to a possession notice was not accepted.
- The landlord's claim that the property was in good condition at the start of the tenancy was not fully accepted.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the rent from £2,400 to £2,300 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rental value.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that due to repair issues and comparable rental values, the rent should be adjusted downward.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's argument about repair issues affecting rental value was key.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as the rent was reduced.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a similar issue should consider repair conditions and comparable rental values when disputing rent increases.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and an inventory of repairs were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
