First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £700.00 for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £700.00 per month. They rejected the landlord's proposal for a higher rent, determining the rent based on the open market value of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination takes into account the periods of the tenancy and the terms of the agreement, excluding certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £700.00 per month.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £700.00 per month, rejecting the landlord's proposed higher rent. The Tribunal determined the rent based on the open market value of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00LC/MNR/2022/0125
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 89a [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 61 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 02 November 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 02 November 2015
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & [APPELLANT] 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord No information provided by the parties.
8. Description of premises 1 bedroom top floor flat in a converted house.
[NAME] of Decision 13 January 2023
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00LC/MNR/2022/0125
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted] : 25th October 2022
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 13th January 2023
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 13th January 2023 that the rent will be £700.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 2nd November 2022.
2. By an application dated 25th October 2022, the [APPELLANT] of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated 30th September 2022 proposed a rent of £750.00 pcm with effect from 2nd November 2022, in place of the current rent of £550.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 2nd November 2015. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and [APPELLANT] 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 7th December 2022 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet (including the Energy Performance Certificate ‘EPC’) and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience, the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a mainly residential area on the north side of Gillingham town centre. Local shops, schools, amenities and public transport services are available in the vicinity.
8. The property comprises a first floor self contained flat in a converted end terrace house 0ccupying a corner site with return frontage to [ADDRESS].
9. The Flat is recorded in the EPC as having: solid brick walls, insulated roof space, double glazing, electric storage heaters and instant hot water at point of use.
10. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, kitchen, bathroom/ w.c, 1 bedroom and attic.
11. No information is provided by the parties as to whether the property is furnished or unfurnished.
12. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are available.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal
13. Tribunal Directions.
3
14. Neither the Landlord nor the solicitor completed the Reply Form or made submissions other than supplying a copy of the current tenancy agreement.
15. [APPELLANT]: Application, Notice of Increase and the April 2014 Tenancy Agreement. The [APPELLANT] did not complete the Reply Form or make submissions.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 16. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
17. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [APPELLANT] or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
18. The Tribunal checked the [NAME] and noted that the subject property has a certificate registering the property at E expiring on 2nd December 2027. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
19. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
20. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in a good condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
21. In the absence of any submissions from either party the Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom, kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine, fridge and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £700.00 pcm.
22. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions, and being presented with no evidence by either party concluded that the rent proposed by the Landlord was in excess of the market rent achievable.
23. Doing the best it can with the limited information contained in the papers submitted by the parties and evidence publicly available, the Tribunal members determined using its professional knowledge and experience that the market rent for the subject property is £700.00 pcm.
24. The rent will take effect from 2nd November 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 25. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
26. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
4
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy in Luton
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Based on Evidence Provided
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared Flat at £715 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £775 for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Condition…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £670.00 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the rent based on what a landlord could reasonably expect in the open market for a property in good condition.
- The Tribunal relied on its own general knowledge of market rent levels due to the absence of submissions from either party.
- The Tribunal considered current market conditions and its professional knowledge to determine the market rent.
- The Tribunal found that the proposed rent was too high compared to the achievable market rent.
- The property's Energy Performance Certificate rating of E met the legal minimum standard for letting.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed rent of £750.00 per calendar month was rejected as being too high.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £700.00 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the open market value of the property, rejecting the landlord's proposed higher rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property, which the Tribunal used to determine the appropriate rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a proposed rent increase if they believe it is not reflective of the open market value.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence and documents that mattered included the tenancy agreement, the Energy Performance Certificate, and publicly available information on the internet.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person wishing to appeal this decision must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal within 28 days of receiving the written reasons for the decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
