First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for a tenant's assured shorthold tenancy. They set the rent at £2,000 per month, considering the current market value of the a person.
⚖️ Legal holding
Under the relevant tenancy legislation, the rent for a property should reflect its open market value, adjusted for the condition and amenities provided.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new tenancy, and ensures that the terms of the new tenancy match the original except for the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The tribunal set a new rent based on the open market value, adjusting for the absence of certain amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy to be £2,000 per month, reflecting the open market value of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AK/MNR/2023/0180
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
[COMPANY] 30 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] Miss M [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 2000 Per Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 April 2023
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable nil Per month
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 26 September 2012
6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises Purpose Built flat c.2010. [NAME] is 2 bedroom, living room/ kitchen, bathroom/wc. Full heating system and double glazed windows. Recently built block located in Eastern Bermondsey. Streetview at June 2022.
Note: The landlord is not obliged to charge this market rent but, may not charge more.
[NAME] of Decision 5 September 2023
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] CHAMBER ([NAME]) Case Reference : LON/00BE/MNR/2023/0121 [NAME] : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted]
[NAME] & Miss M [COUNSEL] (Tenants)
Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] (Landlord) Representative : None Type of [NAME] : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
[NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 21 September 2023
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an [NAME] dated 13 March 2023 from the tenants of the [NAME], regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 20 February 2023, proposed a new rent of £1680.80 per calendar month, with effect from and including 1 April 2023. The passing rent was said to be £1311.66 per calendar month.
3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided.
4 Directions were issued 1 June 2023. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not carry out inspections.
5 The Tribunal received an initial [NAME]. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and tenant. The Tribunal did not receive either back, completed.
6 The Tribunal carefully considered and noted such representations as it received from both parties regarding the location layout size and condition of the [NAME] and other available and let comparable properties in the location.
[NAME]
7 The [NAME] is a purpose built modern ground floor flat in a low rise block, with 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen and bathroom/ wc. There is full central heating and double glazed windows. The landlord refers to it as a 4 person dwelling: There are 2 tenants.
8 The flat was first let on 26 September 2013 for £1200 pcm. The flat was let without carpets or other floor finishes but was supplied with basic white goods of cooker and fridge/ freezer but without washing machine. No curtains, blinds or other furniture was recorded to have been included.
9 The Tribunal had regard to Google Streetview in Marine St. SE16 (data capture June 2022).
Law
10 In accordance with the terms of S14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the [NAME] might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the [NAME] falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the [NAME] to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
11 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Bermondsey it determines that the subject [NAME] would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £2,100 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order. The Tribunal makes a small deduction of £100 pcm for the lack of provision by the landlord or a washing machine, curtains blinds and floor coverings. The market rent is therefore determined at £2,000 pcm.
12 The new rent will take effect from and including 1 April 2023, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. As the Form of Determination dated
5 September 2023 states: The landlord is not obliged to charge this market rent but, may not charge more.
Name: [NAME]. [NAME]: 21 September 2023
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to [NAME] such an appeal, an [NAME] must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such [NAME] must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the [NAME] (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the [NAME], and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME] Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property Based on Evidence Provided
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £775 for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy in Luton
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Shared Flat at £715 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £700.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Condition…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Confirms Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a rent level reflecting the open market value of the property.
- Rent adjustments can be made based on the property's condition and amenities.
- Similar terms for rent levels must reflect the open market value of the property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- No factors identified that went against the claimant in these cases.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured shorthold tenancy at £2,000 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market rent for similar properties in the area.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property to similar properties in the area.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market rent for comparable properties when disputing rent increases.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence included the condition and layout of the property, as well as comparable properties in the area.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
