Tribunal Confirms Rent Increase for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided to uphold a rent increase to £1900 per month for an assured shorthold tenancy, considering the open market value of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property under similar terms.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market, taking into account the same terms and conditions as the original tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal upheld the landlord's proposed rent increase for an assured shorthold tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined that a rent increase to £1900 pcm was reasonable for an assured shorthold tenancy based on the open market value of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BG/MNR/2024/0664
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1900 Per pcm
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 October 2024
*3. The amount included for services is nil Per Calendar month
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 September 2023 rolling
6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None, replaced by tenant
9. Description of premises Purpose Built ground floor flat 1950’s in block of similar. Located in Tower Hamlets. Block is low rise 5 residential levels part of estate of current and former Local Authority housing blocks of flats . Brick wall fair faced double pitched tiled main roof. Property is living room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms, bath/wc. The Landlord may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure shown at box 1.
Chairman N [NAME] of Decision 19 March 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BG/MNR/2024/0664 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted]
[NAME] [COUNSEL] & Nasita Akther (Tenants)
Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] (Landlord) Representative : None Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members :
N [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 19 March 2025
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 27 September 2024 from tenants of the Property, regarding notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 The notice, dated 30 August 2024, proposed a new rent of £1900 per calendar month, with effect from and including 1 October 2024. The passing rent was said to be £1550 per calendar month.
2
3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided and was rolling on from September 2023 the initial term having expired.
4 Directions were issued 23 January 2025. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections.
5 The Tribunal received an initial application. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and tenant. The Tribunal is grateful for information received from the parties.
Property
6 The Property is a c.1950’s built flat, part of a larger purpose built block of flats to 5 levels. Brick fair faced external walls, metal windows which appeared single glazed. Accommodation in the Property on the third level, comprised 2 bedrooms, living room/ kitchen and bathroom/ wc. The furniture provided by the landlord initially had been replaced by the tenant’s own over the years.
7 The Tribunal had regard to Google Streetview (data capture July 2022). Neither party referred the Tribunal to similar properties let or to let.
Law
8 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; assuming the Property to be in a reasonable internal decorative state.
Decision
9 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Tower Hamlets it determines that the subject Property would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1,900 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order and makes no deductions. The rent is therefore determined at £1,900 pcm.
10 The new rent will take effect from and including 1 October 2024, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. As the Form of Determination states: The Landlord is not obliged but, may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of, the figure shown at box 1; £1,900 pcm.
Name: N. [NAME]: 19 March 2025
3
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Set at £800 Per Month by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £775 for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy in Luton
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1000 pcm for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Northampton Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the open market rent for the property to be £1,900 per calendar month.
- The new rent will take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
- The property should be valued as if it were in a reasonable internal decorative state.
- The Tribunal used its general knowledge of market rent levels in the area to make its decision.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal confirmed a rent increase to £1900 per month for an assured shorthold tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to uphold the rent increase because it reflected the open market value of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied in determining the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the open market value of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, who sought the rent increase.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their rent proposal aligns with the open market value of the property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence such as the tenancy agreement and market data were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, the decision can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
