Tribunal Sets Rent for Northampton Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for a property in Northampton at £1150 per month, after considering the market value and specific conditions of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent level that reflects the open market value of the property, adjusted for specific conditions.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's conditions and the terms of the existing tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for a Northampton property under an assured shorthold tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for a property in Northampton, setting it at £1150 per calendar month after considering the market value and specific conditions of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/34UF/MNR/2024/0058 Property :
32 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicants : [redacted] (Tenants) Representative :
[COUNSEL] of Your [COUNSEL] (Agent) Respondent: [redacted]
[NAME] [COUNSEL] (Landlord) Representative : None Type of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 18 June 2024 (online hearing) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 18 June 2024
REASONS FOR DECISION
Background
1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 13 March 2024 from the tenants of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent, served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act).
2 2 The notice, dated 5 January 2024, proposed a new rent of £1200 per calendar month with effect from and including 17 March 2024. The passing rent was stated in the notice, as £1000 per calendar month from an earlier unspecified date.
3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the tenancy and of the landlord’s Notice was provided.
Inspection
4 The Tribunal did not inspect the Property internally but viewed the exterior from a [ADDRESS] image of the Property as seen from the public road (taken @ July 2023). The Property is a three bedroom end terrace house. The house appears to date from the 1930’s and is a former Council house. It forms part of a larger established residential largely former Council estate, with a variety of sizes and layouts of mainly terraced houses of an otherwise similar period.
5 The external face of the walls is brick, with a front hipped, double pitched main roof over the house finished in a slate covering. There is a small roof over the front ground floor brick porch, also finished in slate. There is a enclosed front yard. Although it appears to provide an off road parking space there is no dropped pavement curb or enough space to park a vehicle. There is an especially small rear yard which is open to access from the side. There are no on-road parking restrictions.
6 The Property accommodation is on two levels: Ground: living room, dining room, kitchen, WC; First: 3 bedrooms. Windows are double glazed units throughout and full gas fired central heating; both provided by the landlord.
7 The Property was let with carpets and a fitted cooker. There was no furniture or other white goods from the landlord. The tenants provide these.
Representations
8 Directions, dated 15 March 2024, for the progression of the case, were issued by Legal [RESPONDENT]. The landlord requested a hearing set for 18 June 2024. Both parties attended, the tenants represented by Mr [NAME] and the landlords by Mr [NAME] of the Agent. The Tribunal Chair went through the written representations received from both sides. They invited in turn, clarification from each party, of a number of small points arising from that material. The tenant emphasized the especially small and insecure nature of the back yard.
9 The tenant did not file a standard Reply Form but, the essential Property and tenancy details were set out by them in their initial application form to the Tribunal. They also provided details of other houses to let at and around the valuation date March 2024.
3 10 The landlord filed a standard Reply Form. There were no significant differences in details of the Property, from the tenant’s and landlord’s accounts. The landlord also supplied a copy of a ‘Best Price guide’ commissioned from the Landlord’s Agent which included summary details of other houses to let locally at or around the valuation date March 2024. That Report concluded that the new market rent should be £1200 pcm though the agent felt that by the date of the hearing that might be nearer £1300 pcm.
11 The Tribunal reminded the parties that the valuation date is that set out in the landlord’s notice of rent increase, that is 17 March 2024. The Tribunal is grateful for and has carefully considered such written and oral representations as it received, from parties, before and at the hearing.
Law
12 In accordance with the terms of S.14 of the Act the Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which it considers the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that it is in a reasonable internal decorative condition.
Decision
13 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in Northampton, it determines that the subject property would let on normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1200 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order at the valuation date March 2024.
14 The Tribunal noted the particularly small outside secure space as might otherwise be expected of a house of this size and era. The former larger corner garden had been sold off some years prior, as a plot and now contained an additional detached house, of a similar size to the Property. There was also a slight deficiency in provision of white goods other than of the cooker, by the landlord.
15 For these minor factors the Tribunal makes a deduction from this starting figure, of £50 pcm.
16 The new rent of £1150 per calendar month is payable from and including the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice, 17 March 2024. The landlord may charge any rent up to and including £1150 per calendar month but, not a rent in excess of this figure.
[NAME] 18 June 2024
4
Rights of appeal
By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have.
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision.
Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).
If the application is not made within the 28-[NAME] time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 [NAME] time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/34UF/MNR/2024/0058
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 32 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]
Tenant [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1150 Per Per calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 17 March 2024
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable nil Per week
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 August 2016
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises 2 storey 1930’s end terraced house in an established housing estate with houses of similar age. Brick walls slated double pitched hipped main roof, small ground floor porch roof.. Accommodation: 3 double beds bathroom/wc, living room, dining room, kitchen wc. Front yard & very small open access rear garden. Double glazed, full central heating. Some on- road restrictions. Includes carpets and cooker but, not all white goods. The landlord may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure stated at box 1.
[NAME] of Decision 18 June 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Norwich Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Property Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Ipswich Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Deficient Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent Based on Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a starting market rent of £1200 per calendar month for a fully fitted property in good order.
- The property's particularly small and insecure outside space led to a deduction from the rent.
- A slight deficiency in white goods provided by the landlord, other than the cooker, also contributed to a rent deduction.
- The Tribunal made a deduction of £50 per calendar month for the minor factors identified.
- The new determined rent is £1150 per calendar month, payable from 17 March 2024.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent for a property in Northampton was set at £1150 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the market value and specific conditions of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument about the market value of the property was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the market value and specific conditions of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence about the property's condition and comparable rents was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.
