VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Rent Adjustment for Assured Shorthold Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal reviewed a request to increase rent for an assured shorthold tenancy. They considered the property's condition and amenities and decided to reduce the proposed rent increase to £1050 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the property's condition and amenities.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent adjustments

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination considers the property's condition and amenities, among other factors.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent increase to account for the property's condition and amenities.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal received an application regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord. The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent increase to account for the property's condition and amenities, reducing the rent to £1050 per calendar month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CAM/26UH/MNR/2024/0146 Property : 12 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant : [redacted] Representative : None Respondent : [redacted] Representative : [RESPONDENT] of Application : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : N [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 4 November 2024 First Tier Tribunal (Eastern) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Date of Decision : 4 November 2024

REASONS FOR

DECISION Background 1 The First Tier Tribunal received an application dated 11 September 2024 from the tenant of the Property, regarding a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord, under S.13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the Act). 2 The notice, dated 5 August 2024, proposed a new rent of £1150 per calendar month, with effect from and including 1 October 2024. The passing rent was said to be £950 per calendar month.

2 3 The tenancy is an assured shorthold periodic monthly tenancy. A copy of the last tenancy agreement was provided. 4 Directions were issued 12 September 2024 by Legal [NAME]. Neither party requested a hearing. The Tribunal does not routinely carry out inspections. 5 The Tribunal received an initial application. The Tribunal sent out its standard Reply Form to both landlord and tenant. 6 The Tribunal carefully considered and noted such representations as it received from both parties regarding the location layout size and condition of the Property and other available and let comparable properties in the location if supplied. Property 7 The Property is a one bedroom ground floor flat purpose built in a short terrace of low rise block, of similar sized and constructed flats from the 1970’s. The exterior finish of the walls is fair faced brick to the ground floor, vertically hung tiles to the first floor above. The roof has a low pitched single lap concrete tiled finish. The Property appears to be in fair condition externally. 8 Accommodation includes one bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc, an outside ground floor store shed and use of communal grounds. There was no off road parking. The landlord provided full central heating and hot water system, double glazed window units and kitchen white goods. The floor finishes, curtains and blinds were provided by the tenant. 9 The Tribunal noted the presence recorded by the tenant’s surveyor’s report on the interior of the flat in July 2023. It was produced by [NAME] of [COMPANY] thought now over a year prior to the valuation date. It set out details of some minor disrepair in the bathroom and bedroom. These appeared to stem from excess condensation, a leaking shower enclosure and poor ventilation generally. It was unclear if these minor defects had since been remedied. The Tribunal assumed that the condition of the kitchen and bathroom whilst otherwise functional was basic. The Tribunal noted the tenant’s provision of carpets and curtains. 10 The Tribunal had regard to Google Streetview in [ADDRESS] (data capture August 2024). 11 Neither party referred the Tribunal to rents sought and/or obtained in comparable properties locally at or around the valuation date. The Tribunal is grateful to the parties for the completed Reply Forms and to the tenant for a copy of their 2023 survey of the Property.

3 Law 12 In accordance with the terms of S14 of the Housing Act 1988 we are required to determine the rent at which we consider the property might reasonably be expected to let in the open market, by a willing landlord, under an assured tenancy, on the same terms as the actual tenancy; ignoring any increase in value attributable to tenant’s improvements and any decrease in value due to the tenant’s failure to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Thus the Property falls to be valued as it stands; but assuming that the Property to be in a reasonable internal decorative condition. Decision 13 Based on the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels in and around Stevenage, it determines that the subject Property would let on a normal Assured Shorthold Tenancy (AST) terms, for £1150 per calendar month, fully fitted and in good order. However it makes allowance for the merely functional nature of the kitchen and bathroom for likely minor defects and the absence of carpets and curtains, of £100 pcm. The market rent is therefore determined at £1050 pcm. 14 The new rent will take effect from and including 1 October 2024, the effective start date given in the landlord’s Notice. The Landlord is not obliged but, may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of, £1050 pcm. Name: N. [NAME]: 4 November 2024 Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this decision to the person making the application (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013).

4 If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e., give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CAM/26UH/MNR/2024/0146 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 12 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME] Landlord [APPELLANT] Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is:£ 1050 Per pcm 2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 October 2024 *3. The amount included for services is negligible nil Per Calendar month *4. Service charges are variable and are not included n/a 5. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 December 2017 6. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly periodic 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per tenancy 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 9. Description of premises Purpose Built 1 level flat ground floor c.1970 on a larger residential estate. One Bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom/wc full GFCH, full double glazing. Unfurnished. Assumed basic kitchen, basic shower/bathroom. Some minor disrepair. Tenant’s carpets and curtains. The Landlord is not obliged but may charge a rent up to but, not in excess of the figure shown at box 1. Chairman N [NAME] of Decision 4 November 2024

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The property's condition is considered for rent adjustment.
  • The availability of amenities affects the rent adjustment.
  • Rent is adjusted based on current market conditions.
  • Rent adjustments consider necessary repairs to the property.
  • Fair rent is determined using market comparables.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided to adjust the proposed rent increase to £1050 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The tenant applied for a review of the landlord's proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to reduce the proposed rent increase, considering the property's condition and amenities.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the condition and amenities of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also be able to challenge a proposed rent increase based on the property's condition and amenities.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The survey report of the property's condition and the landlord's notice of rent increase mattered.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.