First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £1,320 to £1,040 per month based on a person's condition. The decision took into account a person's state of repair and its value in the open market.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on a person's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open market rent, considering the reasonable expectation of what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy. The tribunal must disregard certain factors when determining the rent, such as the effect of granting a tenancy to a sitting tenant, increases in the value due to improvements made by the tenant, and decreases in value due to the tenant's failure to comply with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on a person's state of repair.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent based on the property's condition, reducing the rent from £1,320 to £1,040 per month. The decision was based on the property's state of repair and the open market rent value.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BJ/MNR/2024/0297 HMCTS code (paper, video, audio) : P:PAPERREMOTE
Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : Ms. [APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of [NAME] : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Judge Sarah McKeown Mrs. A. Flynn MA MRICS Date and venue of Consideration : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Date of Full Reasons : 11 November 2024
Description of hearing This has been a paper hearing which the parties are taken to have consented to, as explained below. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a paper hearing. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. The Tribunal’s decision is below.
DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,040 per calendar month with effect from 18 June 2024.
2
REASONS
The Background 1. The Applicant succeeded to her father’s tenancy of [NAME] on or about 17 July 2000. Her father’s tenancy commenced in about the mid-1950’s. [NAME] is a first-floor flat, with an entrance hallway, a double bedroom and a single bedroom, a bathroom, living room, kitchen and a small scullery space. There is no written tenancy agreement.
2. The [NAME] states that the Landlord is responsible for plumbing/sanitary appliances and hot water immersion system, the electrical DB and distribution (but not for lamp replacement), structural damage and the annual gas safety check. The tenant is responsible for painting, decorating and heating. It is said that there is lighting and cleaning of common staircase to the flats and entry phone to the common parts but that there is no separate charge for this.
3. On 23 April 2024, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,320 per month in place of the existing rent of £900 per month to take effect from 18 June 2024.
4. On or about 13 May 2024, pursuant to s.13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
5. The Tenant has supported her [NAME] with photographs and a letter (and updated version) which states, among other things: (a) There are defects to [NAME] which fall within the Landlord’s repairing obligations. No works have been carried out for a considerable period; (b) Most of the defects were present during the last rent assessment; (c) None of the walls in [NAME] are straight, the doors and windows are not draught-proof and all of the windows have
3 broken sash cords, are ill-fitting and draughty and rattle noisily when the wind blows; (d) The Tenant does not believe that [NAME] is worth the amount of the current rent. She was told 13 years ago that [NAME] was unlettable, and its condition has worsened since. The Tenant has carried out some works; (e) The Landlord did sent contractors to assess the issue with the sliding door that came away from the wall along with the hanging track and the kitchen sink and base unit which had rotted and partially collapsed at one end, leaving the unit sloping dramatically from one end to the other and it was unstable. Nothing further has been done; (f) Scullery – it is a tiny room, with a very old sink base unit, with the Tenant’s own cooker. The sink leaks and is coming away from the wall and the base unit has rotted, along with the floorboards underneath. The wooden sink unit is broken and warped, the unit is propped up with a temporary piece of wood as the floorboards to one side has rotted. There is a wall panel where the tiles have almost all fallen off the wall, the few tiles that remain fixed are broken. All of the sash windows are stuck shut and the sash cords are broken, the windows are draughty. The vent does not work. There are holse around the communal pipepwork which cause a draught and unpleasant odours. There are a number of disconnected water pipes. The pantry gets condensation from the exposed cold-water pipes running across the ceiling which causes water to drip on to food. The wall surfaces are flaking and uneven in places and there is mould to the walls; (g) Kitchen/dining room – there is heating as the [APPELLANT] family fitted a gas fire. The chimney needs sweeping. The Tenant has filled large gaps between the skirting and the walls. The door to the scullery is a sliding door which has come away from the wall, long with its old faulty runner gear and suspension track, [NAME] it inoperable, causing cold and draughts. The top sash window is stuck and some of the sash cords are broken and they are draughty. The ceiling plaster is bumpy and lumpy. The walls are uneven and cracked and the surface mounted wall pipes make it difficult to decorate. The floorboards are uneven and broken due to the poor quality of previous workmanship. There are no fitted cupboards to here or the scullery area save one corner cupboard – the remainder were provided by the Tenant. A gas safety inspection has condemned the chimney/flue. Some plaster has fallen away from the wall; (h) Bathroom – there is no side bath panels as they were removed years ago. The pipework and concrete floor are exposed. The bath
4 has chipped internal surfaces. The floor is uneven. The toilet sometimes leaks from the pipe at the back. The top sash window can only be opened a little and does not come down very far, [NAME] it draughty and cold. There is no heating. The water cylinder is very small and barely produces enough hot water. The water pressure is very poor. When the wash hand basin was replaced, the [NAME] left exposed services and damaged plaster, there are holes in the wall which remain unfilled. The exposed underside of the bath reveals rough un-plastered brick walls. The ceiling and wall are uneven and have polystyrene tiles and are in a poor condition. The Tenant has carried out some works; (i) Hallway – the walls and ceiling are uneven and the paint is cracking. Some of the wallpaper is coming off and has taken some plaster with it. The Tenant repaired it herself. The entry-phone has broken plasterwork around it. The electric board and meter has local exposed cabling and holes. There is a gap around the front door and its frame which causes draughts. The frame is cracked and broken. The front door is not draught-proofed. The ceiling is uneven and has exposed copper pipework. The floorboards were cut and lifted in the past by the Landlord’s contractors and poorly replaced with over one inch gaps and put back without fixing. This has worsened the unevenness and unsightliness and any linoleum flooring cracks; (j) Living room – there is heating to this room, as the [APPELLANT] family fitted a gas fire. The Tenant has filled the large gaps between the skirting and the walls. The top sash window is struck and some of the sash cords are broken. They are draughty and the windowsill is warped. The ceiling plaster is uneven and bulges and is lumpy in some places. The walls are uneven and cracked in places. Many years ago, the Landlord replaced some wiring and the floorboards were poorly replaced, some of them were split and damaged, leaving an uneven surface. The door does not always open when shut because of a broken wooden frame; (k) Large bedroom – the Tenant has re-plastered this herself following a leak some years ago. The top sash window is stuck shut and the sash cords are broken. The windows are draughty. There is no heating and the Tenant provides electric heating. The ceiling is uneven and “lumpy”. The plaster came away over the window which the Tenant has tried to rectify. Some plaster recently fell away from the ceiling; (l) Small bedroom – the sash cords to the window are broken and the windows are draughty. The floorboards are broken and uneven with large gaps where they have been uplifted and poorly replaced in the past. There is no heating. The ceiling is in a poor state of repair, having been painted in the past by the Tenant. There was
5 a leak from no. 80 which came through to [NAME] and caused damage to the walls and ceiling adjacent to the bathroom wall; (m) The communal stair windows are cleaned when required but are not draught proof. The ground floor shared entrance lock often gets stuck requiring the Tenant to wiggle the key to get in, which does not always work.
6. These matters have not been refuted by the Landlord, who has not provided any evidence.
The Law 7. The way in which the Tribunal is to determine a market rent in this circumstance is set out in Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
8. Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 states: (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy- (a) Which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) Which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) The terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) In respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (0r have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In [NAME] a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) Any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a [NAME];
6 (b) Any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) Was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) Was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) Any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) That it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the dare of the service of the notice; and (b) That, at all times, during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) That, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.
9. The tribunal is to determine the rent at which [NAME] might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “[NAME]”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy.
10. The rent takes effect from the date specified as the starting date of the rent in the notice unless the committee consider that this would cause undue hardship to the tenant, but in that case the rent start date would be no later than the date that the rent is determined.
7 Inspection 11. The Tribunal has not carried out an inspection of [NAME] as no inspection was requested.
Determination and Valuation 12. In the first instance the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for [NAME] in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting.
13. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for [NAME] in a good tenantable condition would be in the region of £2,600 per calendar month. From this level of rent, we have made adjustments in relation to the general state of repair of [NAME].
14. The full valuation is shown below: PCM
AST Market rent
£2,600
Less deduction for state of repair 60% -£1,560
£1,040 Decision 15. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in its current state in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £1,040 per calendar month.
16. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,040 per month to take effect on 18 June 2024, which is the date specified in the notice. Name: Judge Sarah McKeown Date: 11 November 2024
8 Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28 day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, [NAME] and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BJ/MNR/202/0297
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Judge Sarah McKeown Mrs. A. Flynn MA MRICS
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 74, [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Ms. [APPELLANT]. [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,040 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 18 June 2024
*3. The amount included for services is
N/A Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 17 July 2000
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly periodic
7. Allocation of liability for repairs Per s.11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A
9. Description of premises First-floor flat, with an entrance hallway, a double bedroom and a single bedroom, bathroom, living room and small scullery space
Chairman Judge McKeown Date of Decision 11th November 2024
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,320 to £1,040 per month based on the property's condition.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the proposed rent based on the property's state of repair and its value in the open market.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied in determining the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and how it affects the rent value.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property when disputing rent adjustments.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and a letter detailing the property's condition were important in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
