Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £145.00 to £132.00 per week because the property was in poor condition. This decision reflects the importance of property maintenance in determining rent levels.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to the poor condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to the poor condition of the property, reducing it from £145.00 to £132.00 per week, effective from the date of the decision.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/17UH/MNR/2024/0645
Property : 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: Mr [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [APPELLANT]
Landlord’s agent : [RESPONDENT] of application : 10th December 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mrs [NAME] of Decision : 2nd July 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £145.00 per week with effect from 2nd July 2025. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 17th October 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £145.00 per week in place of the existing rent of £132.00 to take effect from 13th December 2024.
2. On 10th December 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal did inspect the property which comprises a semi-detached house having an entrance hall with cloaks cupboard off, lounge, dining room and kitchen with pantry off. On the first floor the landing leads to three bedrooms and bathroom being fitted with a bath and wash hand basin. There is a separate WC with low level suite. The property has double glazed windows and front door. There is no central heating.
4. There are overgrown gardens to both front and rear. To the side is a garage in need of extensive repair/rebuilding.
5. The general condition of the property is poor.
Evidence
6. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant.
7. The Tenant submits that there are the following defects in the property:
a) The fireplaces in the lounge, dining room, kitchen and bedroom are unusable. b) There is rot above the bay windows to the lounge and dining room c) The kitchen needs refitting. d) Areas of the ceiling has fallen in to Bedroom1 and Bedroom 2. e) There are numerous cracks to ceilings and walls throughout the property. f) The bathroom is dated and requires refitting. g) The garage and coal store require replacement. h) The gutters require repair/replacement. i) The roof requires overhauling. j) The front porch is rotten and collapsing. k) Internal doors require replacement/adjustment as many do not open/close properly. l) There is evidence of undue springiness to the suspended ground floors.
8. Having inspected the property, the Tribunal agrees with the Tenant’s submissions.
9. Neither the Landlord or tenant provided any comparable evidence to assist the Tribunal.
3 Determination and Valuation
10. Having considered the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £300.00 per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
a) The condition of the property detailed above. b) Curtains, carpets and white goods fitted by the Tenant. c) Tenant decorating liability
11. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£325.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
£140.00
b) Items given under b) above
£ 25.00 c) Tenant decorating liability @5% £ 15.00 £180.00
£180.00
Say £145.00 per week Decision
12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord to a willing tenant under an assured tenancy was £145.00 per week with effect from 2nd July 2025.
Hardship
13. The Tenant raises hardship in their submissions. Accordingly, the Tribunal directs the new rent of £145.00 per week is to take effect from 2nd July 2025, being the date of the Tribunal’s determination, rather than the date on the Landlords Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 2nd July 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
4
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 19 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] [NAME]
Landlord [COMPANY] c/o Agent: [NAME] St John’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £145.00 Per Week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 2nd July 2025
3. The amount included for services is/is not applicable N/A Per
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 2008 (By succession) 5. Length of the term or rental period N/A 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A semi-detached house comprising entrance hall with cloaks off, lounge, dining room, kitchen with pantry. On the first floor are three bedrooms and bathroom with separate WC. Double glazing. No central heating. Gardens to front and rear. Garage and store (in poor condition)
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR/17UH/MNR/2024/0645
5 Chairman
Date of Decision
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Unmodernised Property - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tribunal agreed with the tenant's list of defects, including unusable fireplaces and rot above bay windows.
- The property's poor general condition was a factor in adjusting the rent.
- The tenant's liability for decorating was considered in the rent adjustment.
- The tenant providing curtains, carpets, and white goods led to a rent adjustment.
- The tenant's claim of hardship resulted in the new rent taking effect from the decision date.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £145.00 per week was not accepted as the starting point for the market rent calculation.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £145.00 to £132.00 per week due to the poor condition of the property.
Who was involved?
The tenant requested a rent adjustment, while the landlord proposed an increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the proposed rent because the property was in poor condition, as evidenced by various defects.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that the property's poor condition justified a lower rent was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure their property is well-maintained to avoid rent adjustments.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of the property's condition, including inspections and written submissions, was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on a point of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
