First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant disputed a proposed rent increase. After reviewing the property's condition and comparing local rents, the First-tier Tribunal set a new rent of £150 per week.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local rental comparisons.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy. The new rent can only take effect if the tenant does not challenge it within the specified time frame.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and amenities.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal reviewed a notice proposing a new rent and determined a fair market rent of £150 per week, taking into account the property's condition and local rental comparisons.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
Case Reference
: BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0699
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [APPELLANT]
Landlord : [COMPANY] of application : 26 March 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] & Philip Morris
FRICS FAAV
Date of Decision : 26 November 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £150 per week with effect from 7 April 2025. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 26 February 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £174.30 per week in place of the existing rent of £132 per week to take effect from 7 April 2025.
2. On 28 February 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal inspected the property on 25 November 2025 and considered the submissions and evidence provided by the parties and had regard to its own knowledge, expertise and online research.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal considered the written submissions provided by the Landlord. No evidence was submitted by the Tenant.
5. From the inspection the Tribunal found the subject property to comprise a communal entrance and ground floor one bedroom (double) flat with kitchen, bathroom and communal laundry and external gardens and front driveway.
6. There were no improvements/works carried out by the Landlord. From the Tribunals inspection it was noted that there was some evidence of water damage in the hallway and bathroom which appears to have come from the flat above. The tribunal also noted some sagging of the ceiling in the bathroom and at the entrance into the bathroom there was a dip in the flooring. The windows were toughened and single glazed timber framed. The kitchen had been refitted approximately 3 years ago according to the Tenant and the bathroom included toilet, wash hand basin and bath and electric shower over. The Tribunal was informed by the Tenant that there was an issue with the toilet flush system that had been reported several times.
7. Only the curtains were supplied by the Tenant. The white goods, carpets and central heating all belong to the Landlord.
8. No evidence was submitted by the Tenant. The Landlord submitted evidence in respect of one, two and three bedroom properties from the locality as well as evidence of a rents for a room, flats and houses in the area. The average rent submitted by the Landlord for a 1 bedroom property was £1,018, a 2 bedroom
3 property was £1,236 and a 3 bedroom property was £2,179 per month. The rents for a single room was £275, a flat at £1,220 and a house at £1,355 per month.
9. The Tribunal considered the evidence submitted by the Landlord but considered that they occupied better locations which included B18 which forms part of the Jewellery Quarter which are better quality developments fitted to a higher specification.
Determination and Valuation
10. Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of our own expert, knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £700 per month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
a) Condition b) Curtains fitted by the Tenant. c) The Tenant’s liability to redecorate.
11. The full valuation is shown below: Per Month
Market Rent
£750
Less a) Items given under a) above
£50.00
b) Items given under b) above
£5.00 c) Tenant’s internal decoration liability @ 5% £40.00 £95.00
£655.00
Total £151.15
Say £150.00
per week Decision
12. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property
might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord
under an assured tenancy was £15o per week (including the service charge) with
effect from 7 April 2025.
Chairman: [NAME]: 25 November 2025
4
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
5
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] & Philip Morris FRICS FAAV
Landlord [COMPANY] [RESPONDENT] 34 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £150 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 April 2025
3. The amount included for services is £79.66 Per week
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 June 1998 5. Length of the term or rental period Weekly - periodic 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None 8. Description of premises Ground floor one bedroom flat with living room, kitchen, bathroom, communal laundry and gardens.
[NAME] of Decision 25 November 2025
First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No.
BIR//00CN/MNR/2025/0699
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Retirement Complex Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Semi-Detached Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £950 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for HMO Bedroom
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,230 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1200 PCM
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent is set at a fair market value based on comparable properties.
- The rent is adjusted according to the property's condition.
- The rent is determined by a tribunal based on evidence and expert knowledge of rental values.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £150 per week for the property.
Who was involved?
The dispute was between a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental comparisons.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparison of local rental prices and the condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the condition of their property and local rental prices when disputing a rent increase.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The evidence included the condition of the property and rental prices from similar properties in the area.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on any point of law arising from this decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.
