Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant challenged a proposed rent increase. After reviewing the property's condition and local rental values, the First-tier Tribunal adjusted the rent to £412.50 per week.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition and local rental values.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering various factors affecting the property's value.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent after considering the property's condition and local rental values, determining a fair market rent of £412.50 per week.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
(c)
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BK/MNR/2025/0773 Property : 210 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : Miss [APPELLANT] Landlord : [COMPANY] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mrs [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 22 December 2025 [ADDRESS], London Date of Summary Reasons : 22 December 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £412.50 per calendar week with effect from 7 April 2025. ____________________________________
2 SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 10 February 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £158.14 per week in place of the existing rent of £153.98 per week to take effect from 7 Apr 2025.
2. On 29 March 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 31 March 2025. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £550 per calendar week. From this level of rent, we have made adjustments in relation to the rodent issue, lack of white goods, curtains and carpets.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
per calendar week Market Rent
£550.00
Less Lack of provision of white goods ) 5% Lack of provision of curtains & carpets ) 5% Rodent issue
) 15%
£137.50
£412.50
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £412.50 per calendar week. Decision
3 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy was £412.50 per calendar week.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £412.50 to take effect on 7 April 2025. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. There were no submissions or evidence provided to substantiate a claim of hardship from the Tenant.
10. We should comment that the rent fixed by the Tribunal is the maximum rent and the Landlord may not charge a rent above that figure. However, in many cases when the Landlord is a Registered Social Landlord, the rent charged may be significantly less than the rent fixed by the Tribunal. Indeed, the Landlord seems to be seeking a rent of £158.14 which is significantly below the rent determined by the Tribunal.
Chairman: [NAME]: 22 December 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BK/MNR/2025/0773
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 210 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
[COMPANY] The Hive, [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Miss [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 412.50 Per week (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 7 April 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable - Per -
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 24 May 2004
6. Length of the term or rental period Weekly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
9. Description of premises Ground floor, 2 bed flat with access to a garden and garage.
[NAME] of Decision 22 December 2025
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Fair Rent to £660 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Property in Poor Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property is in good tenantable condition.
- The rent is adjusted based on local rental values.
- Improvements made by the tenant are considered in the rent adjustment.
- Rent adjustments take into account the property's condition and market conditions.
- Comparable evidence is used to determine the fair market rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to £412.50 per week.
Who was involved?
The tenant challenged a proposed rent increase by the landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the fair market rent adjustment based on the property's condition.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also challenge a proposed rent increase if they believe it is unfair.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both the tenant and the landlord were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if there are grounds for doing so.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
