Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property, reducing it from £1,250 to £935 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The determination takes into account the condition of the property and disregards certain factors such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to non-compliance with tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) adjusted the proposed rent after considering the condition of the property, reducing it from £1,250 to £935 per month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0680
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Ilford Essex 1G1 3DE
Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] 137 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 935 Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 February 2025
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 01/07/2022
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly Assured Periodic Tenancy
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
9. Description of premises A converted ground floor studio flat forming part of a two storey Victorian building. Accommodation comprises: studio room, kitchen, bathroom/WC..
[NAME] of Decision 10 June 2025
1
Case Reference
: LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0680
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [COUNSEL] [NAME]
Landlord : [APPELLANT] : None
Date of Objection : 27 January 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons
: 10 June 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £935 per calendar month with effect from 1 February 2025. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice dated 9 December 2024 under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,250 per month in place of the existing rent of £987.60 per month to take effect from 1 February 2025.
2. On the 27 January 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The application submitted to the Tribunal was not completed but was signed.
3. The parties did not request a hearing or inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement and considered this case on the basis of the limited papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.
Evidence
4. The Tribunal has received completed reply forms from the parties, but no specific details of comparable evidence of rental values of studio flats in the Ilford area from the parties.
Determination and Valuation
5. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Ilford area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £1,100 per month. The Energy Performance Certificate dated 6 July 2019 states the studio flat is 27m2 and has an EPC Rating of 40E which is below average.
6. Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of £1,100 per month to allow for the damaged kitchen fittings, mould to internal walls, basic decorations, basic electric panel heating system, no white goods supplied by landlord..
7. The Tribunal has considered very carefully the information provided by the tenant. Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of 15% should be applied in order to take account of the above matters. This provides a deduction of £165 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £1,487.50 per month.
8. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
3 9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £935 per calendar month.
Decision
10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £935 per calendar month.
11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £935 to take effect on the 1 February 2025. This being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 10 June 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Tenant
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced for Unmodernised Property - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition is poor.
- The property's condition does not meet the standard expected.
- The rent should reflect the actual condition of the property.
- Fair market rent is determined based on the condition and location of the property.
- Rent adjustments are granted when the property's condition justifies it.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,250 to £935 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent based on the poor condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The condition of the property was a key factor in the decision.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
