Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
📌 In brief
The Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £1,200 to £840 per month because the property had serious issues like damp and mould. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This includes considering the condition of the property, such as damp and mould issues, when setting the rent.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent due to property conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £1,200 to £840 per month due to the poor condition of the property, including damp and mould issues. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00ML/MNR/2024/0620
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS], Ham, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 840.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and including council tax)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 26 October 2024
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced Assumed December 2006
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly periodic tenancy agreement
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises A converted first flat with loft conversion above forming part of a three storey Victorian end of terrace building with rendered elevations under a pitched and tiled roof. Accommodation comprises : living room, kitchen, bathroom,/WC bedroom, storage room.
[NAME] of Decision 13 February 2025
1
Case Reference
: HAV/00ML/MNR/2024/0620
Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant : Mr [APPELLANT] c/o of [NAME]
Landlord : Mr [RESPONDENT] of Tenants Objection : 22 October 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] of Summary of Reasons : 13 February 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £840 per calendar month with effect from 26 October 2024. ___________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. On the 22 August 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,200 per month in place of the existing rent of £800 per month to take effect from 26 October 2024. The tenant states that he has lived at the property since December 2006, although a copy of the tenancy agreement was not produced by the parties.
2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. This Notice was dated the 22 August 2024.
Inspection
3. The Tribunal inspected the property on the morning of the 13 February 2025 in the presence of the Tenant and a member of Case. The property is a Victorian end of terrace house converted to form three flats, located in an established road within easy reach of Brighton city centre.. The property is suffering from chronic damp and associated mould to most rooms. The level of mould could certainly be considered a health hazard. It is a microscopic fungus that grows in damp places and can cause respiratory illness. The cause of the damp and mould is usually a mixture of the tenant’s lifestyle and defects to the fabric of the building such as blocked gutters and damp to the brickwork trapped by the render and damaged flat roof.
Evidence
4. Directions were prepared by the Tribunal, and the Landlord subsequently made a Case Management request for his late submissions to be taken into account and this was approved by the Tribunal. The Landlord and the Tenant provided the Tribunal with completed Rent Appeal Statements which included photographs from both parties together with an extract from the electrical report dated 19 February 2024 and damp report dated 2 May 2023. No comparable evidence was provided by the parties.
5. The crucial initial question for the Tribunal to determine: is this a one or two bedroom flat? This matter has a significant impact on rental value. Originally, the property was a one-bedroom flat and the inspection revealed that in subsequent years a loft conversion has been formed to provide an additional room. The room is accessed via a steep timber staircase which is
3 considered a safety hazard. It is evident the conversion works were undertaken some time ago, possibly in the 1970s and as a consequence do not meet modern regulations. In particular fire safety standards. The doors on the exit route are not fire resistant with no integrated self closers, no mains smoke/fire alarms and the access staircase is unsuitable for permanent use. Therefore, occupation of this room is a fire hazard and certainly not fit for human habitation and should be used for storage only.
The Law 6. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, partial exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration and rainwater fittings.
Determination and Valuation
7. Having consideration of our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the Brighton area. The Tribunal consider that the open market rent for the property if it were in good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom, modern services, carpets, curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £1,200 per month.
8. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the damp and mould to the flat, cracking to the wall plaster, defective single glazed window units, dated kitchen and sanitary fittings and unsatisfactory electrical assessment which equates to 30% (£360 per month) It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
Decision
9. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition is £840 per calendar month.
10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £840 per month to take effect on the 26 October 2024. This, being the date set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
4
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Reduces Proposed Rent Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Reduced to £2,500 Due to Property Condition
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's chronic damp and mould, which could be a health hazard, justified a rent reduction.
- The loft conversion room was deemed a fire hazard and unfit for human habitation due to safety issues.
- The Tribunal considered its expert knowledge of rental values in the area to determine the market rent.
- Adjustments were made for the property's poor condition, including damp, cracks, defective windows, and dated fittings.
- The new rent was set to take effect on the date specified in the landlord's notice of increase.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal decided to reduce the proposed rent from £1,200 to £840 per month.
Who was involved?
The tenant challenged the landlord's proposed rent increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the rent based on the poor condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property, particularly the damp and mould issues.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to challenge a proposed rent increase if the property conditions are poor.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and reports regarding the property condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed according to the procedures outlined in the judgment.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
