First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the current market conditions and the property's condition, setting the rent at £975.00 per calendar month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent based on the current market conditions and the property's condition.
📖 What the law says
Under this rule, a tenant with an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent they are paying. However, the application cannot be made if the rent has already been determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also apply to challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar periodic tenancy in the open market, taking into account the property's condition and any improvements or damages caused by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on current market conditions and the property's condition, setting the rent at £975.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/29UM/MNR/2021/0001
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] & Mrs [RESPONDENT] 111 Island Wall, Whitstable, Kent, [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 975.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 30 November 2020
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 May 2012
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises Mid terrace house, 3 [NAME] [NAME] of Decision 29 April 2021
1
Case Reference : CHI/29UM/MNR/2021/0001
Property : 7 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
(Tenants)
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Application : Received 27th November 202o
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 29th April 2021
_______________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 29th April 2021 in the sum of £975.00 per calendar month (pcm).
2. By an application received on 27th November 2020, the tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 29th October 2020 proposed a rent of £975.00 pcm. with effect from 30th November 2020, in place of the current rent of £800.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy which is believed to have commenced on the 21st May 2012. A document, signed by the Tenants, has been provided to the Tribunal dated 1st September 2015 however it is not legible apart from signatures and a reference to a rent of £7oo.oo pcm. In any event the tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 3rd March 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located within a mature residential estate close to the town centre.
8. The property comprises a mid terrace house.
9. The accommodation comprises: 1 reception room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms and bathroom. Outside: garden, shed and off street parking.
10. The property is let unfurnished but excludes carpets, curtains and white goods which have been provided by the Tenant.
11. No specific information was provided to the Tribunal with regard to the supply of utilities. In the absence of any other information the Tribunal has assumed that mains, water, gas and electricity to be connected. Central heating.
Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 18th March 2021.
14. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form and link to Rightmove.
3
15. Tenant: Application.
16. Tenancy Agreement (incomplete).
Landlord's Representations 17. The Landlord says in the Reply Form:
18. Installed a new boiler and repaired guttering.
19. Allowed the tenant a rebate of £100.00 pcm for 6 months to cover the cost of new front door installed by the Tenant.
20. Dripping tap causing the units to deteriorate.
21. Patio door needs replacing.
22. There is a commuter coach to London stopping at the end of the road, the railway station is 1/2 mile away with a direct link to Central London. Primary and secondary schools are 5 minutes away.
23. In support of the proposed rent the Landlord provided a link to Rightmove detailing properties available to rent in Sittingbourne.
Tenant's Representations 24. In the Application the tenant states that:
25. They have replaced the front door, all the carpets and replaced part of the rear garden fence.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 26. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.
27. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
28. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
29. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate which expired 12th December 2019 with a Rating of C . The minimum level for legally letting a property is E.
30. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in
4
satisfactory condition and would prove attractive if offered on the market at the present time.
31. The Tribunal considered the evidence supplied by the Landlord and the link to Rightmove. However no attempt had been made to compare those asking rents to the subject property. In such circumstances the Tribunal relies on its own knowledge and information available to it on the internet.
32. Despite the issue of Directions the Tenant provided no rental evidence in support of their application. The Landlord suggested that the case should be dismissed. [NAME] declined to dismiss the case. The Tenant sent an email to the Tribunal on 11th April 2021. The Tribunal issued Order 1 on 16th April 2021 with a response date of 19th April. In the circumstances the Tribunal declined to admit the Tenants email of the 11th April as it was out of time despite being given the opportunity to rectify the situation.
33. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions concluded that in good condition commensurate with the current market the rent would be £1,050.00 pcm. However the Tenant in this case has replaced the carpets and provided white goods. Taking this into account and the apparent condition of the subject property, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £975.00 pcm.
34. The rent will take effect from 30th November 2020 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 35. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
36. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide
5
whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent of £1500 PCM for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for New Flat in High Wycombe
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Bournemouth Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Rejects Landlord's Proposed Rent Increase
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Property Considering Market Conditions
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for HMO Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy Set by First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £975.00 per calendar month.
- The Tribunal considered the property to be in satisfactory condition, which would make it attractive on the market.
- The tenant's replacement of carpets and provision of white goods were taken into account when determining the rent.
- The Tribunal noted the property's Energy Performance Certificate had expired but still met the minimum legal letting standard.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's email submitted on April 11th was not admitted as evidence because it was out of time.
- The landlord's suggestion to dismiss the case due to the tenant's lack of rental evidence was rejected.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £975.00 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The case involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the property's condition.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 and the Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) Regulations 2015 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the current market conditions and the property's condition.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions and the property's condition when determining rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence and documents related to the property's condition and market conditions were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get a solicitor for a case like this.
