VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Bournemouth Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property in Bournemouth. They took into account the property's condition, its location, and current market conditions. The rent was set at £985.00 per month, starting from March 1st, 2021.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment based on the condition and location of the property, as well as current market conditions.

Topics

rent determinationassured tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will determine a fair market rent based on the condition and location of the property, as well as current market conditions.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

The Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, section 11 implies a covenant by the lessor to keep in repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, installations for the supply of water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, and installations for space heating and heating water. This obligation applies to short leases and ensures the lessee's enjoyment of the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Bournemouth, considering various factors including the property's condition and the current market conditions.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Bournemouth, considering the property's condition, location, and current market conditions. The rent was set at £985.00 per calendar month, effective from 1st March 2021.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HN/MNR/2021/0018

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Mr R Brown FRICS Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT] & [NAME]-[RESPONDENT], 16b [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 985.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 March 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 March 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

8. Description of premises Ground Floor Flat in converted house.

Chairman Mr R Brown FRICS Date of Decision 17 May 2021

1

Case Reference : CHI/00HN/MNR/2021/0018

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

(Tenants)

Respondent: [redacted] (Landlord)

Date of Application : Received 25th February 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mr R T Brown FRICS Chairman Ms C D Barton MRICS Mr S Hodges FRICS

Date

: 17th May 2021

_______________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 17th May 2021 in the sum of £985.00 per calendar month (pcm).

2. By an application received on 25th February 2021, the tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 4th December 2020 proposed a rent of £1,100.00 pcm. with effect from 1st March 2021, in place of the current rent of £970.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy which commenced on the 1st March 2020. The copies of the agreement provided are incomplete. In any event the tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 9th March 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in Southbourne a residential area equidistant from Bournemouth and Christchurch.

8. The property comprises a ground floor self contained flat in a converted house with double glazing and gas central heating.

9. The accommodation comprises: 1 reception room, kitchen, 2 bedrooms and bathroom. Outside: gardens (front and rear), side access and off street parking.

10. The property is let unfurnished but includes white goods, washing machine, fridge/freezer, tumble dryer and dishwasher. Bed frame and garden furniture. On the basis that such items would not be maintained by the Landlord.

11. No specific information was provided to the Tribunal with regard to the supply of utilities. In the absence of any other information the Tribunal has assumed that mains, water, gas and electricity are connected.

Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.

3

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 9th March 2021 and Further Directions on 12th and 29th April 2021.

14. The following information was considered by the Tribunal:

15. Tenant: Application, Reply Form and emails.

16. Landlord: Reply Form, Statements with various attachments, photographs and copies of correspondence with the Tenants, Bournemouth Housing and an electrician.

17. Tenancy Agreement (incomplete).

18. The Tribunal comments that some documents would not open and given that two additional sets of Directions were issued relating to the presentation of documents the Tribunal considered those documents (received after the Direction on the 29th April 2021) it could open but only in so far as they relate to the issue to be determined namely the current market rent with effect from 1st March 2021.

Landlord's Representations 19. The Landlord says (in summary and subject to the Tribunal's comments below) that:

20. The only relevant improvement is to the Bathroom which was carried out at the Landlord's expense prior to the commencement of the tenancy. Due to the pandemic works to the second bedroom were not completed.

21. The Landlord makes reference to websites which offer comparable information. However this is not set out in a reasoned manner. The methodology adopted for calculating the market rent is not shown.

Tenant's Representations 22. The tenant states that (in summary and subject to the Tribunal's comments below):

23. Since moving in they have carried out replacement of floor joists, damp proofing, full bathroom fit out, repair sleeper wall and damp proof course, re-boarded kitchen door, redecorate kitchen and hallway.

24. The second bedroom is uninhabitable since taking up occupation on 1st March 2020. Post July 2020 the Tenants refused the Landlords access to carry out repairs. The Landlords offered to recompense us but to date we have received nothing.

25. The Landlord did not provide an inventory when the property was let and the Landlord is threatening to withdraw the exclusive use of the gardens as originally agreed at the time the agreement commenced.

26. A one bedroom flat in [ADDRESS] was recently let at £675.00 pcm with similar benefits.

4

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 27. The Tribunal may proceed to determine the rent at which it considers the subject property might reasonably be expected to let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

28. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

29. The personal circumstances of the [NAME] are not relevant to this issue.

30. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has a certificate expiring on 2nd October 2025 with a Rating of D. The minimum level for legally letting a property is E.

31. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory. The subject property appears to the Tribunal to be in generally satisfactory condition but into account the factors identified below (Paragraph 36) and would prove attractive if offered on the market at the present time.

32. The Tribunal considered the evidence supplied by the Landlord and the Tenant and came to the following conclusions:

a) There is clearly an ongoing dispute between the parties relating to the tenancy. The Tribunal does not take into account such issues which are not specifically relevant to the determination of a market rent.

b) The Bundles of information that were supplied to the Tribunal primarily concentrated on other issues between the parties and not the issue in the application (i.e. the current market rent). The Tribunal does not take into account such issues between the parties when determining the market rent.

33. In these circumstances in order to consider the matter within the terms of Rule 3 of The Tribunal Procedure (First -tier) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 the Tribunal relies on the experience and knowledge of its members.

34. In summary the relevant information was that relating to the layout of the property, its condition, the Tenant's Bundle and the Landlord's Statement but only so far as those documents relate to the issue before the Tribunal.

35. From the submissions it appears to the Tribunal that the parties are not in dispute as to the fact the second bedroom is in disrepair at present and has been throughout the tenancy.

5

36. The Tribunal finds on the evidence before it that the condition of the electrical installation was due to works undertaken by the Tenants. The condition of the second bedroom continued to exist as a consequence of the Tenant's refusal to afford access to the Landlord to undertake repairs. Accordingly, the Tribunal makes no adjustment to reflect either of these specific matters.

37. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions concluded that in good condition the rent would be £1,000.00 pcm. However the Tribunal in this case considers a deduction should be made to reflect the agreement in respect of maintenance and repair of the white goods. Taking this into account the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £985.00 pcm.

38. The rent will take effect from 1st March 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 39. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

40. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

6

The Tribunal Procedure (First -tier) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 Overriding objective and parties' obligation to co-operate with the Tribunal 3.-(1) The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly. (2) Dealing with a case fairly and justly includes- (a)dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues, the anticipated costs and the resources of the parties and of the Tribunal; (b)avoiding unnecessary formality and seeking flexibility in the proceedings; (c)ensuring, so far as practicable, that the parties are able to participate fully in the proceedings; (d)using any special expertise of the Tribunal effectively; and (e)avoiding delay, so far as compatible with proper consideration of the issues. (3) The Tribunal must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it- (a)exercises any power under these Rules; or (b)interprets any rule or practice direction. (4) Parties must- (a)help the Tribunal to further the overriding objective; and (b)co-operate with the Tribunal generally.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent assessment based on the condition and location of the property.
  • The rent should reflect the current market conditions.
  • The property's condition plays a crucial role in determining the fair rent.
  • Tenants can challenge unreasonable rent increases under relevant housing acts.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • There are no clear losing factors among the provided cases.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Bournemouth, setting it at £985.00 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord regarding an assured tenancy property.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition, location, and current market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition and location of the property were crucial in determining the market rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set lower than what the landlord had proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the property's condition and current market conditions when disputing rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence such as the property's condition, location, and comparable rents were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get legal advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.