VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £3,750.00 PCM

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £3,750.00 per month. They considered the property's condition and market conditions to make their decision.

⚖️ Legal holding

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be set according to the open market value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyproperty condition

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this rule, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent of an assured tenancy. The tribunal will then decide the rent based on what a willing landlord would charge in the open market for a similar property under the same conditions.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal set the rent for a property at £3,750.00 pcm based on market conditions and property condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £3,750.00 pcm, taking into account the property's condition and market conditions.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/43UL/MNR/2021/0101

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 56 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] [NAME] Mr [APPELLANT]

Landlord [NAME] [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 3750.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 September 2021

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 01 December 2019

5. Length of the term or [NAME] period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Floor coverings, curtains and all white goods.

8. Description of premises Substantial double glazed centrally heated 6 (3 en-suite) bedroom house.

[NAME] of Decision 18 October 2021

1

Case Reference

: CHI/43UL/MNR/2021/0101

Property : 56 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted]

(Landlords)

Date of Application : 25th August 2021

Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: [NAME] [APPELLANT] [NAME] [NAME] Mr P Smith FRICS

Date

: 18th October 2021

_____________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021

2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 18th October 2021 that the rent will be £3,750.00 per calendar month (pcm).

2. By an application dated 27th August 2021, the tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.

3. The landlord's notice dated the 29th July 2021 proposed a rent of £3,950.00 pcm with effect from 1st September 2021, in place of the current rent of £3,000.00 pcm.

4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The agreement is in common form and commenced on 1st December 2019. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 8th September 2021 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.

6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:

7. The property is located in a rural part of Farnham which is a popular commuter town for London.

8. The property comprises a substantial double glazed centrally heated detached house.

9. The accommodation comprises: hall, living room, kitchen/conservatory, play room, study, store, 6 bedrooms (3 en-suite), bathroom and WC. 1/2 acre of gardens and ample parking.

10. Carpets, curtains, and all white goods (Oven hob, fridge freezer, washing machine and tumble dryer) are included in the Tenancy.

11. The Tribunal understands that all mains services are connected. Hearing 12. A hearing was not requested.

Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 13. Tribunal Directions dated 8th September 2021.

14. Landlord: Reply Form.

15. Tenant: Application and Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.

3

Landlord's Representations (summarised): 16. The Landlord says:

a) The Landlord undertook repairs when requested by the Tenant including: replacement central heating boiler, the temporary installation of CCTV and the permanent installation of flood lighting. b) The Landlord has been unable to carry out redecorating due to the Tenants being unwilling to move out temporarily (at the Landlord's expense). c) The Tenants have not undertaken any repairs or improvements to the Landlord's knowledge. d) The property extends to 3,800 square feet and is in good modern condition e) The property is in a good school catchment area. Farnham mainline Railway station is within walking distance f ) Mr [APPELLANT] is not a named Tenant. g) Purchase sale particulars are attached with (undated) photographs. i) The Landlord considers the property to be at the lower end of the market in Farnham and produces details of 5 comparables of 5 bedroom houses to let ranging from £4,000 pcm to £6,000 pcm

Tenant's Representations (summarised) 17. The tenant says:

a) Believes the effect of the property being targeted by a violent individual affects the market rent. b) The decor is now tired. c) The heating bills are excessive due to poor insulation. d) The hallway floor contains large gaps. e) The covered garden walkway is unsafe. f) The gas safety inspection was not carried out within 12 months. g) Tenant believes that because there is no [NAME] agent involved this reduces the [NAME] value. h) [APPELLANT] is not the sole the tenant. The tenants are a family of 7 and have all been registered at the property since 2016. i) The rent should be no more than £3,000.00 pcm. Comparables are attached at rents ranging between £1,500.00 pcm to £2,800.00 pcm. j) Photographs (undated) of the property are included.

The Tribunal’s Deliberations 18. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The Tribunal does not take into consideration the personal circumstances of the Landlord or Tenant in making its determination (including issues between Landlord and Tenant which do not affect the [NAME] value of the property itself).

19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice of rent increase was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.

20. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property does not appear on the Register. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is Rating E.

4

21. Based on the knowledge of its members, the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.

22. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels.

23. The Tribunal noted the parties comments on the comparables and the accommodation provided. Having done so, it concluded that a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, curtains, all white goods and an EPC Rating above F would be £4,500.00 pcm.

24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions, the evidence of the parties and using its knowledge and judgement placed more weight on the evidence of the Landlord than that of the Tenant.

25. The Tribunal then considered the apparent condition of the subject property being in need of some internal redecoration. The Tribunal concluded that the sum of £750.00 should be deducted to reflect the apparent state of decoration. The Tribunal did not consider that the Restraining Order should be a matter reflected in the rent as the market would, on a balance of probabilities be unaware of its existence.

26. The Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £3,750.00 pcm.

27. The rent will take effect from 1st September 2021 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.

Relevant Law 28. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

29. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)

RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

5

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the rent based on what a landlord could reasonably get in the open market for the property.
  • The landlord's evidence regarding comparable properties was given more weight by the Tribunal.
  • The property's need for some internal redecoration led to a deduction from the market rent.
  • The Tribunal found that the notice of rent increase was properly served under section 13 of the Housing Act.
  • The market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with good facilities and an EPC Rating above F would be £4,500.00 pcm.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's belief that a restraining order affecting the property should reduce the rent was not accepted.
  • The tenant's argument that the absence of a letting agent reduces the property's value was not accepted.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £3,750.00 pcm.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and market conditions were the most important arguments.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should expect the rent to be set based on the property's condition and market conditions.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of the property's condition and comparable rental prices were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.