First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £945.00 per calendar month, considering the current market conditions and the condition of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord may reasonably expect to obtain a rent of £945.00 per calendar month for a semi-detached bungalow in Dawlish, Devon, given the current market conditions and property condition.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent that a willing landlord might reasonably expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the current market conditions and the condition of the property.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy to be £945.00 per calendar month, taking into account the current market conditions and the condition of the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UH/MNR/2023/0007
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 3 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr & Mrs [RESPONDENT] & [RESPONDENT] 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr & Mrs [APPELLANT] & [APPELLANT] [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 945.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 15 January 2023
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 15 February 2014
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets and curtains.
8. Description of premises Two bedroom semi-detached bungalow with off-street parking on driveway.
[NAME] of Decision 13 March 2023
1
Case Reference
: CHI/18UH/MNR/2023/0007
Property : [ADDRESS], Dawlish, Devon, EX 7 0HA
Applicant: [redacted]
Respondent: [redacted]
Date of Application : Received 4th January 2023
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 13th March 2023
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 13th March 2023 that the rent will be £945.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 15th January 2023.
2. By an application received by the Tribunal on the 4th January 2023, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 10th December 2022 proposed a rent of £1,050.00 pcm with effect from 15th January 2023, in place of the current rent of £780.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. The tenancy agreement is in common form and is dated 15th February 2014. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions dated 23rd January 2023 and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located in a cul de sac within a residential area of Dawlish. Local amenities are available.
8. The property comprises a semi detached bungalow of brick and block construction under a tiled roof. The property is centrally heated and double glazed.
9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, kitchen, bathroom/wc and 2 double bedrooms. Outside: Garden and 0ff street parking 0n driveway.
10. The property is let unfurnished with no white goods.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected.
Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.
13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
14. Tenant: Application, Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.
Landlord's Representations (summarised):
15. The Landlord says in the Reply Form and attachments:
3
a) At first letting the property was in show home condition but has been allowed to deteriorate due the tenants occupation. b) Photographs of the property at time of letting (2014) are attached to the Reply Form. c) Between 2016 and 2022 repairs were carried out: Roof, new consumer unit (electrics), w.c., energy efficient boiler, bath and kitchen taps, door strip, shower unit, fencing at front of property. d) Copy invoices are included. e) Also included is email correspondence with the Tenants regarding repairs. f) There are good transport links (rail and bus) to Exeter and the rest of the country. g) The town centre is 10 minutes’ walk as are the local primary and secondary schools. The beach is 5 minutes walk.
16. As to rental value the Landlord says only one semi detached bungalow is currently available at £1,150.00 pcm but it has only 1 parking space. Details of other properties within the wider South Devon area are provided at rents ranging from £825.00 to £1,400.00 pcm. (Tribunal’s Note: The reproduction was poor, making it difficult for the Tribunal to consider this evidence in detail. Further it was not analysed by the Respondent).
17. In her submission the Landlord explains the history of the tenancy and her experience as an accredited Landlord.
Tenant's Representations (summarised)
18. The Tenant says in their Application and Reply Form:
a) Tenant’s repair and improvements: Replace ‘lean to’ carport roof, secured fences, annual decorating, clearing gutters, repair kitchen units and edging to bath. b) In their submission the Applicants say that the property was in poor condition when they took on the Tenancy and in evidence produce a letter they wrote to the agent at the time. c) A large number of photographs dated 25th January 2014 are included. d) A copy of the inventory (including photographs) at the time of letting is also included. e) Further photographs are included showing the condition of the property at various times during the tenancy together with photographs of repairs undertaken by the Tenants. f) Further correspondence between the parties (and the [NAME]) regarding the history relating to the property and previous rent reviews is included.
19. As to the proposed rent the Tenants provide two comparables: a) 3 bedroom semi detached house in Chudleigh, same council tax band, asking £1,100.00 pcm. b) 2 bedroom semi detached bungalow in Kingsteington fully modernised: Let agreed at £895.00 pcm.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations
4
20. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
21. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the [NAME] are not relevant to this issue. For the benefit of the parties Tribunal explains that when considering the submissions from the parties, it considers only those matters (in so far as such matters can be identified from the papers provided) which directly affect the rental value in the market today, ignoring matters such as a tenant’s failure to meet its obligations under the agreement.
22. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property has an expired certificate (dated 12th February 2022) registering the property at D. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
23. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
24. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, full suite of white goods and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £975.00 pcm.
25. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:
a) Lack of white goods: £30.00
26. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £945.00 pcm.
27. The rent will take effect from 15th January 2023 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 28. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
29. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
5
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £890.00 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Rent Increase in First-tier Tribunal
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent for Neglected Property Based on Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £795 for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should reflect current market conditions.
- The rent should consider the property's condition.
- The rent should be assessed based on market comparables.
- The rent should take into account the tenant's repair obligations.
- The tenant can challenge a rent increase under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The rent does not need to reflect current market conditions.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a new rent of £945.00 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the current market conditions and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the current market conditions were the most important factors.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should consider the current market conditions and the condition of their property when determining rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property, invoices for repairs, and comparable rental prices were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if they have permission from the First-tier Tribunal.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
