VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £1,675

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value in Exeter. They set the rent at £1,675 per month, considering the condition of the property and comparable evidence from the landlord.

⚖️ Legal holding

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy should reflect the open market value of the property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancyopen market value

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the condition of the property and comparable evidence.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value in Exeter.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on the open market value in Exeter, setting the rent at £1,675 per month. The decision was based on the condition of the property and comparable evidence provided by the landlord.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/18UC/MNR/2023/0292

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 23 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [RESPONDENT] [NAME] [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [NAME] S.A.R.L. Address c/o [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1675.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 01 January 2024

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 08 October 2022

5. Length of the term or rental period Unknown

6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None for valuation purposes.

8. Description of premises A purpose built flat forming part of a block built in 2018 located in the city centre. Two bedroom, bathroom, en-suite shower room, living room/kitchen, balcony.

[NAME] [NAME] of Decision 6 February 2024

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case reference :

CHI/18UC/MNR/2023/0292

Property : 23 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant (Tenant) :

[NAME] [COUNSEL] : None Respondent (Landlord) : [NAME] S.A.R.L. Representative : None Type of [NAME] : Section 13(4) Housing Act 1988 Tribunal members :

[NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] : Paper Case Date of Extended Reasons : 6th February 2024

DECISION

2 Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition as at the 1st January 2024, being the proposed date of increase might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured tenancy is £1,675 per month Background 1. The tenant has lived in the property as an assured periodic tenant since 8th October 2022 when the Assured Tenancy Agreement commenced. It is unfortunate that the parties were unable to provide the Tribunal with the tenancy agreement.

2. On the 30th November 2023 the landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £1,,523 per month to £1,829 per month, being an increase of £306 effective from 1st January 2024. The landlord confirms this global rental figure includes £39 for broadband and £25 for a pet. (Net rent is therefore £1765)

3. By an [NAME] dated 8th December 2023, the tenant referred that notice to the Tribunal for a determination of the market rent. The Tribunal issued Directions for the conduct of the matter on 2nd January 2024 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.

4. The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing. The Property and the Evidence 5. The Tribunal has before it, a bundle of evidence which includes the [NAME], the directions, completed Rent Appeal Statements on behalf of each party with photographic evidence and floor plan. The landlord confirmed the flat has a floor area of 729 sq ft and provided a schedule in support of the fact that rental values are not purely driven by floor area but adjustments are made for individual aspect and layout. The tenant provided photographs confirming the condition of the common parts following a flood. The tenant states the flat is located on the second floor whereas the landlord stated it is located on the third floor. The Tribunal does not consider this to be a relevant valuation factor.

3 6. The accommodation comprises: 2 bedrooms, living room, kitchen, bathroom, en-suite shower room and balcony. There is central heating and double-glazed windows. The flat has 24-hour concierge and private gym facilities. The block is located in the city centre and provides exclusive accommodation. The Law 7. The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration. The Valuation 8. Having carefully considered all the evidence the Tribunal considers that the rent that would be achieved in good condition with reasonably modern kitchen and bathroom fittings, modern services, carpets, curtains and white goods supplied by the landlord would be £1,675 per month. This figure is based upon the comparable evidence provided by the landlord and the Tribunal’s professional judgement and experience in the Exeter area. This rental value is inclusive of £25 for a pet and the provision of broadband.

9. The average rent for rental properties in the Exeter area has increased every quarter since the end of 2019, according to the online property portal Rightmove. The rent increases are due to not enough properties coming to the market to meet demand and the number of homes for rent is 46% below 2019 levels. This puts this decision in context with the current rental market.

10. The Tribunal has not been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement, However it is assumed the agreement incorporates the usual repair obligations.

11. The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from 1st January 2024.

4

D [NAME] [NAME] 6th February 2024

Rights of appeal

By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written [NAME] for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the [NAME]. If the [NAME] is not made within the 28-day time limit, such [NAME] must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the [NAME] for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The [NAME] for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party [NAME] the [NAME] is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further [NAME] for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent was determined based on what the property could achieve in the open market under an assured tenancy.
  • The Tribunal used comparable evidence provided by the landlord and its professional judgment for the Exeter area.
  • The determined rent includes amounts for a pet and broadband.
  • Rental values in the Exeter area have increased due to high demand and low property availability.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £1,675 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the open market value of the property in Exeter, taking into account the condition of the property and comparable evidence.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and comparable evidence provided by the landlord were crucial in determining the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, as the rent was set lower than what the landlord had proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer a rent increase to the First-tier Tribunal if they believe the proposed rent is too high.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs and a floor plan of the property, along with comparable evidence from the landlord, were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.