First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition, lack of amenities, and market comparables, setting the rent at £1,160.00 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent assessment based on the property's condition and market comparables.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the property's condition and market comparables.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and market comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the fair rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition, lack of amenities, and market comparables. The rent was set at £1,160.00 per calendar month.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. CHI/00HD/MNR/2022/0085
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 2 Hanham Mills, Bristol, [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] [NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] c/o [APPELLANT], 62 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [NAME] [APPELLANT] & [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1160.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 27 August 2022
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced July 2008
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs As per section 11 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises 3 bedroom riverside terrace house on the River Avon flood plain.
[NAME] of Decision 8 September 2022
1
Case Reference
: CHI/00HD/MNR/2022/0085
Property : 2 Hanham Mills, Bristol [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted]
(Tenants)
Respondent: [redacted]
[NAME] of Application : 25th July 2022
Type of Application : Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] [NAME] [NAME] [NAME]
: 8th September 2022
_____________________________________________
REASONS FOR DECISION ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
2 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
Background 1. The Tribunal gave formal notice of its decision by a Notice dated 8Th September 2022 that the rent will be £1,160.00 per calendar month (pcm) with effect from 27th August 2022.
2. By an application dated 25th July 2022, the Tenants of the above property referred a notice of increase in rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 to the Tribunal.
3. The landlord's notice dated the 8th July 2022 proposed a rent of £1,300.00 pcm with effect from 27th August 2022, in place of the current rent of £1,060.00 pcm.
4. The tenancy is an assured shorthold. There is no tenancy agreement provided but the Tribunal is told the tenancy commenced in July 2008. The tenancy is subject to the Landlord's repairing obligations defined in Section 11 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Property and Inspection 5. Following the Directions and the explanation contained therein, the Tribunal did not inspect the premises.
6. Extracting such information as it could from the papers supplied to the Tribunal by the parties, by reference to information publicly available on the internet and with the benefit of its knowledge and experience the Tribunal reached the following conclusions and found as follows:
7. The property is located on the banks of the River Avon to the south east of Bristol City Centre.
8. The property comprises a double glazed centrally heated terrace house.
9. The accommodation comprises: Living Room, kitchen/diner, bathroom, 3 bedrooms and attic bedroom. Outside: Patio, garden and parking.
10. The property is let unfurnished without floor coverings, curtains or white goods.
11. The Tribunal assumed that all mains services are connected. Documents supplied to and considered by the Tribunal 12. Tribunal Directions.
13. Landlord: Tribunal Reply Form.
14. Tenant: Application Reply Forms, Notice of Increase and Tenancy Agreement.
Landlord's Representations (summarised):
15. The Landlord’s agent says in the Reply Form and attachments:
a) There are 2 popular pubs/restaurants. b) Ideal riverside location.
3
c) The property has flooded in the past but there is now a more localised control system designed to prevent further flooding. d) Undated photographs are attached. e) Extract from the 2010 auction particulars describing the property as 4 bedrooms.
16. As to rental value the agent says it assesses the rental at £1,500.00 plus pcm. There are no direct comparables but 4 bedroom terrace houses are going for £1,350.00 to £1,500.00 pcm. On the open market this property would achieve more that the Landlord’s prosed £1,350.00 pcm.
Tenant's Representations (summarised)
17. The Tenant says in the Application and Reply Forms:
a) A floor plan and undated photograph of the 4th bedroom. b) The Tenants replaced the log burner, provided all kitchen white goods. c) In the second floor built stud wall and window to create 4th bedroom. d) Undated photographs showing: poor plaster work, black mould, pipework under sink, dilapidated kitchen units. e) Photographs of floods in 2019, 2020 and 2021. f) Photographs of current kitchen. Bathroom refurbished by Tenants during lockdown. g) Disrepair includes: Window seals need painting, Damaged plaster from roof leak, Bathroom has leaks. h) After the 2013 flood Tenants replaced all white goods. i) Nearest bus stop 25 minute walk, station 20 minute car ride and electric scooters 25 minute walk. j) During the 14 years in the property the Tenants have carried out repairs and maintenance including (with council approval) removing 3 trees.
18. The Tenants believe that a fair increase would be to £1,160.00 pcm.
The Tribunal’s Deliberations 19. The Tribunal found as a matter of fact that the notice was a Notice under section 13 as prescribed by Statute.
20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an Assured Tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant or Landlord are not relevant to this issue.
21. The Tribunal checked the National Energy Performance Register and noted that the subject property did not have a certificate. The legal minimum standard for letting a property is rating E.
22. Based on the knowledge of its members the Tribunal finds that the market for this type of property is very sensitive to condition and inventory.
23. The Tribunal, acting as an expert tribunal, determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the subject property in the open
4
market if it were let today in the condition and subject to the terms of such a tenancy that is considered usual for such an open market letting. It did this by having regard to the evidence supplied by the parties and the Tribunal’s own general knowledge of market rent levels. Having done so, it concluded that such a likely market rent for a similar modernised property in fair condition with modern central heating, modern bathroom and kitchen facilities, floor coverings, cooker, washing machine and an EPC Rating of E or above would be £1,300.00 pcm.
24. The Tribunal, after careful consideration of the current market conditions and the apparent condition (as submitted by the parties) of the subject property determined to make deductions in respect of issues identified:
a) General disrepair (damp plaster etc): £50.00 b) Lack of floor coverings, curtains and white goods: £60.00 c) Works undertaken by Tenant (General maintenance and bathroom refurbishment): £20.00 d) Flood risk: £10.00
Total deduction £140.00 pcm
25. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that the market rent for the subject property is £1,160.00 pcm.
26. The rent will take effect from 27th August 2022 being the date specified by the landlord in the notice of increase.
Relevant Law 27. Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
28. Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) Regulations 2015 (SI 2015 No.620)
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision (on a point of law only) to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
5
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £1,100.00 for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £890.00 Monthly
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy at £1,050.00 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Assessment for Bradford Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Successfully Challenges Rent Increase in First-tier Tribunal
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The property's condition significantly affects the fair rent assessment.
- Comparable properties' rental values are considered in determining fair rent.
- Rent determination must reflect the open market value of the property.
- Tenants can challenge rent increases under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
- Landlords have reasonable expectations regarding rent based on market conditions.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1,160.00 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on the property's condition, lack of amenities, and market comparables.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property and the lack of amenities were key arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also challenge their rent based on the property's condition and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and descriptions of the property's condition were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
